1996
DOI: 10.1016/0300-483x(96)03336-7
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Urine mutagenicity and biochemical effects of the drinking water mutagen, 3-chloro-4-(dichloromethyl)-5-hydroxy-2[5H]-furanone (MX), following repeated oral administration to mice and rats

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
16
2
1
0

Citation Types

0
7
0
0

Year Published

Range
1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
17
2

Relationship

0
19

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 19 publications

(7 citation statements)
references

References 40 publications

0
7
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Despite its strong in vitro mutagenicity, MX was only marginally active at inducing nuclear anomalies in the small intestine of mice when given as a single oral dose of 0.37 mmol/ kg [Daniel et al, 1991]. Thus, it has been hypothesized that mammalian cells may effectively detoxify chlorohydroxyfuranones, including MX [Daniel et al, 1991;Meier et al, 1996]. In fact, it has been shown that MX is efficiently inactivated by endogenous defensive systems such as those involving glutathione and cysteine [LaLonde and Xie, 1993;Watanabe et al, 1994].…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Most tumor promoters, both complete carcinogens and pure tumor pro- moters including non-liver tumor promoters like TPA, have the ability to inhibit cell-cell communication in WB cells [ Loewenstein, 1979;Trosko et al, 1983;Trosko and Goodman, 1994;Evans and Martin, 2002]. It has been suggested that MX might primarily affect the mucosa of the alimentary tract, when exposure levels are sufficient to overwhelm the defense capacity relying on glutathione or other factors, or when defense systems are impaired [Nishikawa et al, 1994;Meier et al, 1996]. Previously, we reported that MX induces cell proliferation in the gastric mucosa of rats even at low, nontoxic doses such as 25 ppm [Nishikawa et al, 1994] as well as at higher doses [Furihata et al, 1992].…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation