2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban–rural differences in atmospheric mercury speciation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
45
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
11
45
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Average GOM concentrations in the spring were statistically higher than those in other seasons. The GEM trend at Dartmouth was partly consistent with other urban sites, where higher average GEM concentrations were typically observed in spring or summer (Liu et al, 2010;Xu and Akhtar, 2010;Nair et al, 2012). This was attributed to enhanced GEM emissions from surfaces during warmer months and regional source emissions (e.g.…”
Section: Seasonal Concentrationssupporting
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Average GOM concentrations in the spring were statistically higher than those in other seasons. The GEM trend at Dartmouth was partly consistent with other urban sites, where higher average GEM concentrations were typically observed in spring or summer (Liu et al, 2010;Xu and Akhtar, 2010;Nair et al, 2012). This was attributed to enhanced GEM emissions from surfaces during warmer months and regional source emissions (e.g.…”
Section: Seasonal Concentrationssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…This was attributed to enhanced GEM emissions from surfaces during warmer months and regional source emissions (e.g. increased electricity generation) (Liu et al, 2010;Xu and Akhtar, 2010). Seasonal patterns for PBM at Dartmouth were consistent with most of the urban locations in Table 1.…”
Section: Seasonal Concentrationssupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, excessive mercury emissions from power plants can increase regional and even global mercury levels in the air. The levels of gaseous mercury in China are much higher than the global background (1.5-2.0 ng/ m 3 ) (Valente et al, 2007), and those in urban air in North America and Europe (2.0-4.6 ng/m 3 ) (Li et al, 2008;Liu et al, 2010;Manolopoulos et al, 2007), primarily due to the widespread coal burning in China (Mao et al, 2010). Therefore, reduction of mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants can help to reduce the atmospheric mercury pollution and the health risk of the general population.…”
Section: Mercury Emissions From Electricity Generation In Chinamentioning
confidence: 99%