2019
DOI: 10.1002/aqc.3059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upstream migration of the anadromous sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinusLinnaeus, 1758) in a highly impounded river: Impact of low‐head obstacles and fisheries

Abstract: 1. Fisheries and the presence of low-head obstacles are considered major threats for anadromous lampreys, including the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus). Nonetheless, research is still needed to increase our understanding of their effect and to implement effective conservation and management measures. Petromyzon marinus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An anadromous species whose upstream migration to spawning grounds has been severely impacted by anthropogenic structures is the sea lamprey Petromyzon marinus L. (Guo et al, 2017). Upstream-migrating adults can experience substantial delays at man-made barriers (Silva et al, 2019), and individuals failing to pass have been recorded moving downstream, possibly in search of alternative passage routes (Rooney et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An anadromous species whose upstream migration to spawning grounds has been severely impacted by anthropogenic structures is the sea lamprey Petromyzon marinus L. (Guo et al, 2017). Upstream-migrating adults can experience substantial delays at man-made barriers (Silva et al, 2019), and individuals failing to pass have been recorded moving downstream, possibly in search of alternative passage routes (Rooney et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An anadromous species whose upstream migration to spawning grounds has been severely impacted by anthropogenic structures is the sea lamprey Petromyzon marinus L. (Guo et al., 2017). Upstream‐migrating adults can experience substantial delays at man‐made barriers (Silva et al., 2019), and individuals failing to pass have been recorded moving downstream, possibly in search of alternative passage routes (Rooney et al., 2015). In other anadromous species, individual variation in movements away from barriers following an approach (“retreats”) have been linked to environmental conditions, phenotypic traits, and predator avoidance (Alcott et al., 2021; Harbicht et al., 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consequences of river habitat fragmentation on anadromous populations can be severe (Limburg & Waldman, 2009; Hall, Jordaan & Frisk, 2011). For sea lamprey, the adverse impacts of barriers on their migration have now been observed in telemetry studies across their native range (Andrade et al, 2007; Castro‐Santos, Shi & Haro, 2017; Silva et al, 2019), with historical evidence suggesting that access to available spawning habitat is drastically reduced (Mateus et al, 2012). Here, the impacts of multiple structures on upstream sea lamprey migration appeared to be cumulative; although no weir on the Severn or Teme was a complete barrier to upstream migration, the majority of structures inhibited a proportion of the upstream‐migrating cohort, to the extent that no individuals migrated as far as the most upstream navigation weir on the River Severn.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adults of this jawless vertebrate, native to the northern Atlantic and Mediterranean (Guo, Andreou & Britton, 2017), feed parasitically on large marine vertebrates before migrating into fresh water to spawn in shallow, fast‐flowing river habitats (Maitland, 2003; Rooney et al, 2015). Concerns over sea lamprey population declines, attributed primarily to overharvesting, pollution, habitat loss, and artificially constructed barriers to migration (Guo, Andreou & Britton, 2017; Silva et al, 2019; Moser et al, 2020), are reflected in international conservation legislation. The species is listed in the European Habitats Directive, both in Annex II, which requires European Union member states to designate high‐quality sites that contain listed species as Special Areas of Conservation (SACs), and in Annex V, which ensures that any exploitation of listed species is sustainable (Council of the European Communities, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factors determining passage success of an upstream fishpass include attraction efficiency mediated by position of entrance and attraction flow and passability mediated by slope, flow velocity in the migration corridor, height differences and physical dimensions (Banks 1969;Bunt et al 2012;DWA 2014;Hershey 2021, USFWS 2019. Failing upstream passage success of fish result in excessive energy expenditure and migration delays (Noonan et al 2012;Silva et al 2019;Thorstad et al 2008) and thus, delayed arrival at spawning events (Silva et al 2019), and increased predation (Agostinho et al 2012). When HPPs are aligned in cascades their cumulative barrier effects must be considered (Geist 2021) as it aggravates already significant delays, migration failures and mortalities threatening the persistence of fish populations (Caudill et al 2007;Gowans et al 2003;Muir et al 2001;Roscoe et al 2011;Williams et al 2001).…”
Section: Upstream Passagementioning
confidence: 99%