2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.116.090402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upper Bounds on Spontaneous Wave-Function Collapse Models Using Millikelvin-Cooled Nanocantilevers

Abstract: Collapse models predict a tiny violation of energy conservation, as a consequence of the spontaneous collapse of the wave function. This property allows us to set experimental bounds on their parameters. We consider an ultrasoft magnetically tipped nanocantilever cooled to millikelvin temperature. The thermal noise of the cantilever fundamental mode has been accurately estimated in the range 0.03-1 K, and any other excess noise is found to be negligible within the experimental uncertainty. From the measured da… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
161
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
161
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both bounds, however, are weaker than those coming from non-interferometric tests: violation of the equipartition theorem with cantilevers [18], and X-ray measurements [17]. At present, non-interferometric tests proved the strongest upper bound for the CSL parameters; what is not clear is whether these bounds are robust against changes in the collapse mechanism, while those associated to interferometric tests are [19].…”
Section: Comments and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Both bounds, however, are weaker than those coming from non-interferometric tests: violation of the equipartition theorem with cantilevers [18], and X-ray measurements [17]. At present, non-interferometric tests proved the strongest upper bound for the CSL parameters; what is not clear is whether these bounds are robust against changes in the collapse mechanism, while those associated to interferometric tests are [19].…”
Section: Comments and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In both cases, we have considered the value of the CSL parameter as λ GRW = 1. Mpc −1 , which corresponds to a value favored by experimental data [55,56,59,60]. The various plots in each figure correspond to different values of the characteristic energy of inflation V 1/4 , and the total e-foldings N that inflation is assumed to last, which also set the values of τ and η f .…”
Section: Rimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Adler suggested a greater value λ Adler 10 −8 s −1 for r C 100 nm [58] (the parameter r C is called the correlation length of the noise and provides a measure for the spatial resolution of the collapse [41,43,57]). Recent experiments have been devised to set bounds on the parameter λ [59,60]. Furthermore, it is claimed that matter-wave interferometry provides the most generic way to experimentally test the collapse models [55,56].…”
Section: A Concise Synopsis Of the Csl Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[38] bound other collapse models [48] in the spirit of what has been done in Refs. [49,50], for example.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%