2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.10.390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upgraded Seawater-Alkaline Pre-Treatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass for Bio-Methane Production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chemical pretreatments were reported to be expensive due to high costs of disposal of digestion residues ( (Rouches et al, 2017). Other studies reported chemical methods with respect to alkali pretreatment to be inexpensive (Song et al, 2014;Amin et al, 2017;Gumisiriza et al, 2017;Ismail et al, 2017;Kumar and Sharma, 2017). The benefit of Ca(OH)2 pretreatment is the low disposal costs as Ca can be easily recovered from the hydrolyzate (Amin et al, 2017).…”
Section: Pretreatment Methods Observations Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chemical pretreatments were reported to be expensive due to high costs of disposal of digestion residues ( (Rouches et al, 2017). Other studies reported chemical methods with respect to alkali pretreatment to be inexpensive (Song et al, 2014;Amin et al, 2017;Gumisiriza et al, 2017;Ismail et al, 2017;Kumar and Sharma, 2017). The benefit of Ca(OH)2 pretreatment is the low disposal costs as Ca can be easily recovered from the hydrolyzate (Amin et al, 2017).…”
Section: Pretreatment Methods Observations Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on pretreatment of corn straw, Ca(OH)2 could be a better option than NaOH although their pretreatment costs were not highly variable (Song et al, 2014). Alkali pretreatment was favored over other pretreatments due to low operational costs (Ismail et al, 2017). The low cost of lime and ease of recovery from the waste make it a better pretreatment technology than other alkalis (Kumar et al, 2017).…”
Section: Pretreatment Methods Observations Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In chemical pretreatment, ozone consumes higher energy, and a higher range of equipment is needed; thus, it increases the operational cost. Moreover, the alkali pretreatment favors lower OPC (Ismail et al, 2017). Moreover, lime usage reduces the operational cost for an easier recovery, making this pretreatment method feasible (Kumar and Sharma 2017).…”
Section: Operating Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of various alka pre-treatments resulted 14.5%, 13.7%, 14.1% and 15.1% using NaOH, KOH, Ca(OH)2 Na2CO3, respectively. Alkaline pre-treatment contributes to the chemically mod structure of lignocellulosic EFB, breaking up the crystalline structure and increasing accessible surface area of EFB for a better interaction with metal sulphates in catalyst p aration [23]. The trends in the catalysts' acidity and conversion rate over different alkaline pretreatments and untreated-EFB are shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Effect Of Various Chemical Pre-treatments On the Esterificat...mentioning
confidence: 99%