2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2021.116841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unusual ion transport behaviour of ethylammonium nitrate mixed with lithium nitrate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…51,52 They also noted an increase in the diffusion coefficient of lithium ions in micro-confined ethylammonium nitrate compared with that of the bulk IL. 95 Consistent with other reports, a possible cause of the positive deviation in the diffusion coefficient for the 1 μm IL films is a decrease in solvent viscosity near the substrate due to alterations in the intermolecular interactions. 48,51−53,95−98 Figure 5 shows the diffusion coefficient of ATTO 647 plotted with the ratio of temperature to the viscosity of the bulk solvent.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…51,52 They also noted an increase in the diffusion coefficient of lithium ions in micro-confined ethylammonium nitrate compared with that of the bulk IL. 95 Consistent with other reports, a possible cause of the positive deviation in the diffusion coefficient for the 1 μm IL films is a decrease in solvent viscosity near the substrate due to alterations in the intermolecular interactions. 48,51−53,95−98 Figure 5 shows the diffusion coefficient of ATTO 647 plotted with the ratio of temperature to the viscosity of the bulk solvent.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…As previously mentioned, Filippov et al noted increased self-diffusion coefficients in micro-confined (∼3 to 4 μm) ILs compared with that of the bulk IL. , They also noted an increase in the diffusion coefficient of lithium ions in micro-confined ethylammonium nitrate compared with that of the bulk IL . Consistent with other reports, a possible cause of the positive deviation in the diffusion coefficient for the 1 μm IL films is a decrease in solvent viscosity near the substrate due to alterations in the intermolecular interactions. , , Figure shows the diffusion coefficient of ATTO 647 plotted with the ratio of temperature to the viscosity of the bulk solvent. The 1 μm films show the most non-linear dependence of the diffusion coefficient on the ratio of temperature to viscosity; the bulk solvent viscosity may not be an acceptable estimate for the 1 μm films.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…For many ILs, non-Arrhenius dependences are common. 65,66 The reason for this is that the glass transition temperature, T 0 , is close to the measurement temperature. Under such conditions, the diffusion data are better analyzed using a VFT equation (eqn (3)).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The behavior of these interfacial nanostructure is not due to chemical reactions at the interface, as the electrical potentials applied on HOPG are within the electrochemical window of EAN. [ 32 ] Instead, they mainly result from ion transport phenomena. This behavior is similar to that previously seen in pure EAN and EAN‐water mixtures on mica [ 20 ] and other self‐assembled soft matter systems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%