1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf00748181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unusual coordination of the superoxide ion O2 ? with molecules of halogenated hydrocarbons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[20,28] As g ʈ = 2.275 is higher than the typical values observed for copper() complexes with an N 2 O 2 coordinating sphere and similar to those observed by Talzi et al, [30] we propose that the major Cu species immobilised in [Cu(acac) 2 ]AMPTSi/HMS_B have an NO 3 coordinating sphere as shown in Scheme 1 (other species, for example, with an N 2 O 2 coordination sphere and present in low quantities, cannot be unambiguously excluded because of the solid-state broadening effects in the EPR spectra). Although the spectrum was taken at low temperature, the bandwidths of the signals are still large to detect the nitrogen superhyperfine splittings (typically 14-25 G), due to the interaction between the copper unpaired spin and the nitrogen nuclear spin (I = 1), hence hindering the direct confirmation of nitrogen atoms coordinated to the copper() centre in the equatorial plane.…”
Section: Anchoring Of Copper(ii) Acetylacetonate Onto the Aminefunctisupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[20,28] As g ʈ = 2.275 is higher than the typical values observed for copper() complexes with an N 2 O 2 coordinating sphere and similar to those observed by Talzi et al, [30] we propose that the major Cu species immobilised in [Cu(acac) 2 ]AMPTSi/HMS_B have an NO 3 coordinating sphere as shown in Scheme 1 (other species, for example, with an N 2 O 2 coordination sphere and present in low quantities, cannot be unambiguously excluded because of the solid-state broadening effects in the EPR spectra). Although the spectrum was taken at low temperature, the bandwidths of the signals are still large to detect the nitrogen superhyperfine splittings (typically 14-25 G), due to the interaction between the copper unpaired spin and the nitrogen nuclear spin (I = 1), hence hindering the direct confirmation of nitrogen atoms coordinated to the copper() centre in the equatorial plane.…”
Section: Anchoring Of Copper(ii) Acetylacetonate Onto the Aminefunctisupporting
confidence: 87%
“…An NO 3 coordination sphere would give rise to intermediate g values, with some overlap with the intervals given above, but confirmation with experimental data is quite difficult due not only to the failure of the preparation the free counterpart of the anchored complex (all synthetic attempts resulted in oils which we were unable to fully characterise), but also to the almost nonexistent EPR data for compounds with these coordinating atoms: only Murphy et al reported a silica-anchored [Cu(salicylaldimine)] species with an NO 3 coordinating sphere, which showed a g ʈ = 2.29 [20] and Talzi et al reported Cu II complexes with an equatorial NO 3 coordination sphere with g ʈ = 2.27-2.28. [30] Nevertheless, some insights into the coordination sphere of the anchored complex can be gathered indirectly by comparison with g and A values of the parent copper complex and those with mixed NO 3 coordination spheres shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Anchoring Of Copper(ii) Acetylacetonate Onto the Aminefunctimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are mainly square planar complexes sometimes with a weak coordination at the fifth position. Talzi et al [26] also reported copper(II) complexes with N 2 O 2 ligand geometry to show g k values of 2.27-2.28. Spectroscopic studies for Cu-S-SBA-15, therefore, clearly indicate that copper(II) complex formed in SBA-15 matrix is a square planar one as shown in Scheme 1A.…”
Section: Structural Integrity Analysismentioning
confidence: 90%
“…7,11 Organic radicals with g-factors 42.01 have been observed previously in the presence of halogenated solvents. 31 Experiments were prepared using dichloromethane, so to rule out the possibility of trapped solvent interacting with the radicals, an experiment was performed (results not shown) using benzene as a solvent, thus removing any chance of halogens entering the system, and no differences were found between experiments with different solvents. Therefore the radical with a g-factor of 2.0116 is likely also an oxygen centred radical on highly oxidized PAC (Table 2).…”
Section: Pccp Papermentioning
confidence: 99%