1983
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)92865-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsuspected Pregnancy Loss in Healthy Women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0
2

Year Published

1987
1987
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This study recorded a miscarriage rate of 13.7% which compares very favourably with our overall miscarriage rate of 11%. Other studies have reported early miscarriage rates affecting between 8% (Whittaker et al, 1983) and 61% (Edmonds et al, 1982) of pregnancies. Consequently, though patients in the multi-agent group appeared to be at greater risk of miscarriage (18%) than those in the single agent group (8%), it is unlikely that they are at greater risk than that of the general population.…”
Section: Miscarriagesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This study recorded a miscarriage rate of 13.7% which compares very favourably with our overall miscarriage rate of 11%. Other studies have reported early miscarriage rates affecting between 8% (Whittaker et al, 1983) and 61% (Edmonds et al, 1982) of pregnancies. Consequently, though patients in the multi-agent group appeared to be at greater risk of miscarriage (18%) than those in the single agent group (8%), it is unlikely that they are at greater risk than that of the general population.…”
Section: Miscarriagesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Firstly, data presented as embryo survival probabilities at different times post-fertilization 55, 58, 59, 61, 63 are fecundabilities, i.e., successes per cycle, not per fertilised embryo. Secondly, for reasons that are unclear, data from Whittaker 60 and Leridon 18 were excluded from the modelling analysis and the data from an earlier Wilcox report 55 were included twice since this preliminary data had been incorporated into the later report 63 . Thirdly, the modelled data were normalised to a survival probability of 0.287 at 21 days post-fertilization.…”
Section: What the Data Saymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proportion of early pregnancie s not becoming clinically apparent varied from 8 OJo (19) to 57 OJo (20). In a later study , in which a very sensitive assay was used, the rate of early pregnancy loss was 22 OJo when the total pregnancy loss, including clinically recognized spontaneous abortions, was 31 OJo (21).…”
Section: Frequency Of Spontaneous Abortionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Some of the variation in the rate of very early abortion may be due to the different sensitivity and specificity of the used laboratory assays (19,21). For example , cross-reacti vity with urinary human luteinizing hormone or its degraded fragments may have caused false positive results in earlier studies (21).…”
Section: Frequency Of Spontaneous Abortionmentioning
confidence: 99%