2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12870-017-1008-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unraveling the complexity of transcriptomic, metabolomic and quality environmental response of tomato fruit

Abstract: BackgroundThe environment has a profound influence on the organoleptic quality of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) fruit, the extent of which depends on a well-regulated and dynamic interplay among genes, metabolites and sensorial attributes. We used a systems biology approach to elucidate the complex interacting mechanisms regulating the plasticity of sensorial traits. To investigate environmentally challenged transcriptomic and metabolomic remodeling and evaluate the organoleptic consequences of such variations… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
3
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They also indicate the need for careful selection of crop genotypes that have robust agronomic, and other desirable traits, under different agroecosystems (Grobkinsky et al, 2015); that is, crop genotypes that result in consistent expression of traits across agroecosystems and environments. Metabolic networks across genotypes and agroecosystems highlight differences in the structure of primary metabolic networks and reveal the fluidity of plant metabolic networks; in agreement with the recent discussion on differential networks of plant metabolism (Omranian et al, 2015;D'Espito et al, 2017).…”
Section: Impact Of Agroecosystem and Crop Genotype On The Tomato Metasupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They also indicate the need for careful selection of crop genotypes that have robust agronomic, and other desirable traits, under different agroecosystems (Grobkinsky et al, 2015); that is, crop genotypes that result in consistent expression of traits across agroecosystems and environments. Metabolic networks across genotypes and agroecosystems highlight differences in the structure of primary metabolic networks and reveal the fluidity of plant metabolic networks; in agreement with the recent discussion on differential networks of plant metabolism (Omranian et al, 2015;D'Espito et al, 2017).…”
Section: Impact Of Agroecosystem and Crop Genotype On The Tomato Metasupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The hairy vetch cropping system has relatively lower soil temperatures, different N fertility, and an altered soil microbial community (Teasdale and Abdul-Baki, 1997;Buyer et al, 2010). Consistent with these findings, when three tomato cultivars were grown in a conventional production system at two field locations that varied in environmental conditions (average air temperature, soil texture, soil pH, soil mineral content) reprogramming of transcription and the metabolome occurs in a genotype-specific manner (D'Espito et al, 2017).…”
Section: Impact Of Agroecosystem and Crop Genotype On The Tomato Metamentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Nonpolar (carotenoids) and semi-polar (phenylpropanoid) analyses were carried out by liquid chromatography coupled to diodearray detector and atmospheric pressure chemical ionizationhigh-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-DAD-APCI-HRMS) or electrospray ionization (LC-DAD-ESI-HRMS), respectively, operating in positive and negative ion modes, as previously described (D'Esposito et al, 2017;Fasano et al, 2016;Su et al, 2015). Identification of carotenoids was performed as reported previously (Liu et al, 2014).…”
Section: Nonpolar and Semi-polar Metabolite Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soluble fraction was analyzed by HPLC-DAD-HRMS and HPLC-DAD (Ahrazem et al, 2018; Moraga et al, 2009). The liposoluble fractions (crocetin, HTCC, -cyclocitral, carotenoids and chlorophylls) were extracted with 0.5:1 ml cold extraction solvents (50:50 methanol and CHCl 3 ), and analyzed by HPLC-DAD-HRMS and HPLC-DAD as previously described (Ahrazem et al, 2018; Castillo et al, 2005; D’Esposito et al, 2017; Fasano et al, 2016). Metabolites were identified on the basis of absorption spectra and retention times relative to standard compounds.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%