2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6028(01)00812-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unoccupied spin-split surface state on Co(0 0 0 1): experiment and theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15. The values of the three parameters z I , z A , and z E that finally lead to a quantitative agreement between the measured and the calculated spectra are the following: z I …”
Section: ͑9͒mentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…15. The values of the three parameters z I , z A , and z E that finally lead to a quantitative agreement between the measured and the calculated spectra are the following: z I …”
Section: ͑9͒mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…5,6 In contrast, exchange-split surface states with both majority and minority components completely filled or empty serve as sensors of the surface magnetic properties but do not influence the net spin density responsible for the magnetic moment. [7][8][9][10] Since Ni͑111͒ and Co͑0001͒ with their hexagonal surface geometry exhibit surface-derived states close to the Fermi level, 5,[11][12][13][14][15] a similar behavior is expected for the Fe͑110͒ surface with its twofold but almost hexagonal symmetry. However, the experimental results reported for Fe͑110͒ so far are not conclusive with respect to crystal-induced surface states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…48,49 Therefore, in our experiments the samples were remantently magnetized in the film plane along the corresponding easy axis. For Fe(110) this is along N , for Co(0001) along M, and for Ni(111) along K, 37,[49][50][51] as indicated in Figs. 1(a), 1(e), and 1(f).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 The discrepancy has been explained in terms of a strong nonlocality of correlation effects not taken into account in the present DMFT/3BS calculations. In the case of Co, which has been at the focus of (S)ARPES experiments since the beginning of the 1980s, 8,[32][33][34][35][36][37][38] only a few studies have been devoted to a detailed comparison between many-body calculations and experiments. 32,35,[39][40][41] Here we point out that SARPES revealed a strong spin dependence of the scattering rates at high BE (i.e., the bulklike Co majority spin bands show a much larger broadening when compared to the corresponding bulklike minority bands for binding energies larger than ∼1 eV).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the electronic properties of Co/ W͑110͒ have only been investigated by spatially averaging techniques where stacking fault effects are not detectable. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19] Apart from the question of the influence of stacking, there are also contradictory results concerning the surface-related states of Co(0001) itself. Early angle resolved photoelectron spectroscopy (ARUPS) measurements claimed an sp-like surface state at −0.3 eV with respect to the Fermi energy, 20,21 which was later ascribed to a d 3z 2 −r 2-like state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%