2015
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m115.691337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unmasking of CD22 Co-receptor on Germinal Center B-cells Occurs by Alternative Mechanisms in Mouse and Man

Abstract: Background: Changes in glycosylation on germinal center B-cells have the potential to influence CD22. Results: CD22 is unmasked on germinal centers due to loss of its preferred ligand. Conclusion: Different biosynthetic mechanisms in mice and humans down-regulate the preferred CD22 ligand on germinal center B-cells. Significance: Conserved unmasking of CD22 on germinal center B-cells from mice and humans suggests an important role for CD22 in the germinal center.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
77
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
77
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cognate interactions between B and T cells are critical for GC initiation and maintenance, and CD22 ligands are expressed on T cells as well as B cells [11,27]. Interestingly, high affinity ligands for CD22, while present on naïve and memory B cells, are lost on GC B cells [28]. Thus, one attractive possibility is that once CD22 is unmasked on GC B cells, CD22L-CD22 interactions may then occur in trans between CD22L + CD4 T FH cells and CD22 + GC B cells to promote further B cell survival and maturation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cognate interactions between B and T cells are critical for GC initiation and maintenance, and CD22 ligands are expressed on T cells as well as B cells [11,27]. Interestingly, high affinity ligands for CD22, while present on naïve and memory B cells, are lost on GC B cells [28]. Thus, one attractive possibility is that once CD22 is unmasked on GC B cells, CD22L-CD22 interactions may then occur in trans between CD22L + CD4 T FH cells and CD22 + GC B cells to promote further B cell survival and maturation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biotinylated I-Ealpha peptide was synthesized by Invitrogen and used to generate both NP-streptavidin-I-Ealpha and NP-streptavidin-AF647-I-Ealpha which were prepared and tested in control experiments as described [28]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this aspect, it is satisfying that hCD22 on our transgenic B-cells high degree of colocalization with mCD22, demonstrating the cis glycan ligands on murine B-cells are sufficient to regulate hCD22 localization. Although the predominant type of sialic acid on murine B-cells is α2-6-linked N -glycolylneuraminic acid (Neu5Gc), while on human B-cells it is α2-6-linked N -acetylneuraminic acid (Neu5Ac), it is noteworthy that hCD22 does not discriminate between these two types of sialic acid, unlike mCD22 that strongly prefers the glycolyl version(29, 70). The ability of hCD22 to recognize sialic acid glycan-containing glycan ligands on mouse B-cells is likely a key factor in its ability to functionally substitute for mCD22 in the various aspects we report herein.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these are roles for trans ligands, cis ligands also have the potential playing a role in these events since cis ligands ‘mask’ the ability of CD22 to interact with trans ligands. Altered masking of CD22, such as the ‘unmasking’ of CD22 in the germinal center (GC) that occurs through subtle changes in glycan ligands on GC B-cells, has the potential to fine tune the activity of B-cells in different ways(29). In this regard, it is noteworthy that defects in memory B-cell formation were recently been reported in CD22 −/− mice(30).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are important caveats. Firstly, the microbiology of the mouse varies to that in the human gut [ 338 ], secondly, the glycobiology of the mouse gastric mucosa also varies to that in man [ 339 ], and finally there are immunological differences [ 340 ]. Together these caveats make comparison with the human gut difficult and unpredictable.…”
Section: Glycan Expression When the Gastrointestinal Microbiota Ismentioning
confidence: 99%