2020
DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201902363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universality in Oxygen Evolution Electrocatalysis: High‐Throughput Screening and a Priori Determination of the Rate‐Determining Reaction Step

Abstract: Material screening is commonly based on the assessment of linear scaling relations that translate to a Volcano curve in order to identify promising electrode materials, situated at the apex of the Volcano. Recently, an advanced material‐screening approach, entitled ESSI‐descriptor activity maps, has been introduced by the author. This methodology goes beyond the thermodynamic framework of Volcano plots, as the concept of ESSI‐descriptor activity maps evaluates, besides binding energies, the kinetics, applied o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides that, Δ G 2 for formation of OH* has always acted as a descriptor for indicating the activity trends of the modeled materials 38 . The scaling relation of Δ G 2 and Δ G 3 for formation of OH* and OOH* should be also coupled: 2.6 eV ≤ Δ G 2 + Δ G 3 ≤ 3.6 eV 39 . As seen from the relationship of overpotential and Δ G 2 , the calculated Δ G 2 for W 0.2 Er 0.1 Ru 0.7 O 2− δ −1 (1.01 eV) was the apex of the volcano (Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides that, Δ G 2 for formation of OH* has always acted as a descriptor for indicating the activity trends of the modeled materials 38 . The scaling relation of Δ G 2 and Δ G 3 for formation of OH* and OOH* should be also coupled: 2.6 eV ≤ Δ G 2 + Δ G 3 ≤ 3.6 eV 39 . As seen from the relationship of overpotential and Δ G 2 , the calculated Δ G 2 for W 0.2 Er 0.1 Ru 0.7 O 2− δ −1 (1.01 eV) was the apex of the volcano (Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hitherto, this selectivity problem was studied by ΔE O as descriptor in junction with conventional volcano analyses. [28][29][30][31] This finding motivates to re-investigate the CER vs. OER selectivity, applying ΔG OÀ OH as descriptor, with advanced material-screening frameworks, such as overpotential-dependent volcano plots, kinetic scaling relations, or activity maps based on the electrochemical-step symmetry index; [45][46][47]70,71,80] these concepts have been recently introduced by the author and have shown to provide better results in thorough sorting of electrode materials compared to the conventionally applied volcano scheme. [48,74] Table 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these works refer to amodel system, whereas it is unclear if the findings obtained hold true in ah omologous series of materials on which the screening of electrodes is based. Even if first steps toward ac onsideration of overpotential and kinetics into trend studies within ac lass of materials have been made, [21,[23][24][25][26][54][55][56][57][58] further investigations are necessary to validate the relationship between optimum binding energy and the volcanosapex (Figure 3) for avariety of two-electron and multielectron processes.A so utlined in the present Viewpoint, two different interpretations of the volcanos apex are possible;either 1) optimum performance is ascribed to athermoneutral catalyst at zero overpotential, DG RI = 0V at h = 0V -this precondition is used in the majority of the literature studies-or,2 )optimum performance is given by at hermoneutral catalyst at target overpotential, DG RI = 0V at h > 0V .O bviously,t hermoneutral bonding of RIs,a s approximately observed in nature, [35] is akey factor to design highly active electrocatalysts.Ipersonally conceive that the requirement of at hermoneutral electrocatalyst should be fulfilled at overpotentials corresponding to typical reaction conditions rather than at h = 0V (Figure 3), as substantiated by the discussion of free-energy diagrams and Tafel plots in conjunction with microkinetic modeling described herein.…”
Section: Standpunktmentioning
confidence: 99%