2002
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.65.040301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universal quantum computation and simulation using any entangling Hamiltonian and local unitaries

Abstract: What interactions are sufficient to simulate arbitrary quantum dynamics in a composite quantum system? We provide an efficient algorithm to simulate any desired two-body Hamiltonian evolution using any fixed two-body entangling n-qubit Hamiltonian and local unitaries. It follows that universal quantum computation can be performed using any entangling interaction and local unitary operations.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
195
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(196 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
195
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We propose a number of axioms that such measures might be expected to satisfy and investigate some implications of these axioms. 8 The structure we adopt is first to describe ͑in Sec. III B 1͒ the fundamental axioms that we expect any strength measure should satisfy.…”
Section: B Axiomatic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We propose a number of axioms that such measures might be expected to satisfy and investigate some implications of these axioms. 8 The structure we adopt is first to describe ͑in Sec. III B 1͒ the fundamental axioms that we expect any strength measure should satisfy.…”
Section: B Axiomatic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning gates, i.e., discrete time unitary evolutions, it has been shown in the early days of quantum information theory that almost any two-qubit gate is universal [8]. Similarly, any fixed entangling two-body interaction was shown to be capable of simulating any other two-body Hamiltonian when supplemented by the set of all local unitaries [9]. The many-body analogue of this problem was solved in [10] and the efficiency of quantum simulations was studied in various contexts (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Repeating this procedure N times, we then get the transformation e −i(σ x q 1 σ x i 1 +σ y q 1 σ y i 1 )π/4 , which is a swap gate between q 1 and i 1 (and multiplication by −i when their states are different) [9]. In order to reduce the error, the number of repetition N can be quite large [15], therefore many local gates (44N in total) are needed. The interaction time needed is π/2J xy .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%