Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2019
DOI: 10.24963/ijcai.2019/164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unifying Search-based and Compilation-based Approaches to Multi-agent Path Finding through Satisfiability Modulo Theories

Abstract: We unify search-based and compilation-based approaches to multi-agent path finding (MAPF) through satisfiability modulo theories (SMT). The task in MAPF is to navigate agents in an undirected graph to given goal vertices so that they do not collide. We rephrase Conflict-Based Search (CBS), one of the state-of-the-art algorithms for optimal MAPF solving, in the terms of SMT. This idea combines SAT-based solving known from MDD-SAT, a SAT-based optimal MAPF solver, at the low-level with conflict elimination of CB… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing approaches to solve MAPF problems are categorised as optimal solvers, bounded-suboptimal solvers, prioritised solvers, rule-based solvers, and so on. Optimal solvers include Conflict Based Search (CBS) [19], Branch-and-Cut-and-Price (BCP) [20], A* based solvers [21] and Reduction Based Solvers [22]. These solvers solve the problem optimally and their weakness is the poor scalability.…”
Section: Multi-agent Path Findingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing approaches to solve MAPF problems are categorised as optimal solvers, bounded-suboptimal solvers, prioritised solvers, rule-based solvers, and so on. Optimal solvers include Conflict Based Search (CBS) [19], Branch-and-Cut-and-Price (BCP) [20], A* based solvers [21] and Reduction Based Solvers [22]. These solvers solve the problem optimally and their weakness is the poor scalability.…”
Section: Multi-agent Path Findingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective of our empirical evaluation was to compare the performance of the different variants of our translation against representatives of search-based and SAT-based solvers. We compared to the publicly available SAT-based solver MDD-SAT [22] (enc=mdd), the SMT compilationbased solver SMT-CBS [17], and the search-based solver ICBS-h [9]. Our evaluation is focused on relatively small grids since grounding time grows too much for larger grids (e.g., 512 × 512), making the approach impractical.…”
Section: Empirical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We evaluate our approach on synthetic square grids and warehouse grids with an increasing number of agents. We compare against MDD-SAT [11], SMT-CBS [17] two stateof-the-art compilation-based solvers, and to ICBS-H [9], a representative of the state-of-the-art in search-based MAPF. We observe that our approach outperforms search-based solvers when agent congestion is high.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective of our empirical evaluation was to compare the performance of the different variants of our translation against representatives of search-based and SAT-based solvers. We compared to the publicly available SAT-based solver MDD-SAT (Surynek 2014) (enc=mdd), the SMT compilation-based solver SMT-CBS (Surynek 2019), and the search-based solvers EPEA* (Goldenberg et al 2014), and ICBS-h (Felner et al 2018). Our evaluation is focused on relatively small grids since grounding time grows too much for larger grids (e.g., 512 × 512), making the approach impractical.…”
Section: Empirical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We evaluate our approach on synthetic square grids and warehouse grids with an increasing number of agents. We compare against MDD-SAT ( Surynek et al 2016), SMT-CBS (Surynek 2019) two state-of-the-art compilation-based solvers, and iCBS-h (Felner et al 2018), a representative of the state-of-the-art in search-based MAPF. We observe that our approach outperforms both MDD-SAT and iCBSh when congestion is high.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%