1967
DOI: 10.1007/bf00532093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uniformity in weak convergence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These metrics are defined as follows (of. [16,27] It is known that/3 metrizes the topology of weak convergence on ~( Z ) [16] and that a sequence (/x,) in ~( Z ) converges to/x ~ ~( Z ) in the sense of the (pseudo-) metric a~ if (/x,) converges weakly to/x and if Y3 is a/x-uniformity class ( [7] and Remark 5.2). For interrelations of/3 and ~ to other probability metrics on ~( Z ) we refer to the literature [16,27] and to Remark 5.10.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These metrics are defined as follows (of. [16,27] It is known that/3 metrizes the topology of weak convergence on ~( Z ) [16] and that a sequence (/x,) in ~( Z ) converges to/x ~ ~( Z ) in the sense of the (pseudo-) metric a~ if (/x,) converges weakly to/x and if Y3 is a/x-uniformity class ( [7] and Remark 5.2). For interrelations of/3 and ~ to other probability metrics on ~( Z ) we refer to the literature [16,27] and to Remark 5.10.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Dehardt (1971) the proof of uniform convergence relies on the monotonicity of a family of functions under a fixed invariant distribution. Also, Billingsley and Topsoe (1967) prove various uniform convergence results for compact classes of functions. All these results fall short of what is generally required to substantiate con-sistency for simulation-based estimators in which the uniform convergence of the simulated statistics must hold over a continuum of invariant distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The shortcoming of the test <I> at 9 is denoted by y(<j>,9) and defined by y(<j>, 9) This definition implies that y(<j>,9) ~ 0 for all 9 belonging to 8A and for all level a tests <j>. The maximum shortcoming of the test <I> when 9 ranges * over GA is denoted by y ($):…”
Section: Most Stringent and Everywhere Asymptotically Most Stringent mentioning
confidence: 99%