2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.86.064432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uniaxial magnetic anisotropy of cobalt films deposited on sputtered MgO(001) substrates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
28
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The dipolar interaction between the magnetic charges acts as a coupling field favoring parallel alignment of magnetization, inducing a surface anisotropy with easy axis along the wrinkles. The strength of surface anisotropy is estimated less than 3 × 10 3  erg/cm 3 , which is by far less than the contribution from the oblique deposition 21, 34, 35 .
Figure 2Hysteresis loops with magnetic field applied parallel ( θ  = 0°) and perpendicular ( θ  = 90°) to wrinkles for FeCoTa films grown ( a ) with different pre-strains of 0%, 5%, 20%, 40% and ( b ) with different deposition angles of 0°, 15°, 30°, 45°.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The dipolar interaction between the magnetic charges acts as a coupling field favoring parallel alignment of magnetization, inducing a surface anisotropy with easy axis along the wrinkles. The strength of surface anisotropy is estimated less than 3 × 10 3  erg/cm 3 , which is by far less than the contribution from the oblique deposition 21, 34, 35 .
Figure 2Hysteresis loops with magnetic field applied parallel ( θ  = 0°) and perpendicular ( θ  = 90°) to wrinkles for FeCoTa films grown ( a ) with different pre-strains of 0%, 5%, 20%, 40% and ( b ) with different deposition angles of 0°, 15°, 30°, 45°.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Such induced anisotropy has also been used to control the interlayer exchange coupling in Fe/Cr/Fe trilayers 8 or exchange biased multilayers. 9 In the literature, we basically find two methods of imprinting UMA in magnetic layers by IBS techniques: on one hand, ion erosion is applied to a substrate, usually a silicon wafer, to make ripples in its surface, i.e., to prepattern the surface onto which the magnetic film can be subsequently grown; [12][13][14][15] on the other hand, the magnetic film is first deposited on a polished substrate, later an ion beam erodes directly the film surface to induce a ripple pattern. 16,17 Other authors have pursued different strategies, for instance, Umlor has found UMA to be related to oblique deposition of a non-magnetic buffer layer; 18 similarly Yakovlev et al have made use of the intrinsic groove morphology of the CaF 2 /Si (1 0 0) interface to form a ripple pattern on the cobalt films grown atop.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the comparable values of K u and K s in Table I for samples 3 and 4, we conclude that the UMA inferred from the magnetization reversal is dominated by the anisotropic surface roughness resulting from the grazing-incidence ion beam sputtering [7,12].…”
Section: B Magnetization Reversalmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In particular, grazing-incidence ion beam sputtering has been demonstrated as a reliable tool to manipulate the magnetic anisotropy. The sputtering results in the development of nanoscale surface ripples, giving rise to an in-plane uniaxial magnetic anisotropy (UMA) with controllable orientation and strength through the sputtering conditions [5][6][7][8][9]. Bisio et al employed ion beam sputtering to achieve step-induced UMA in Fe films on flat Ag (001) substrates [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%