2018
DOI: 10.1177/0261018318780910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unemployment, wellbeing and the power of the work ethic: Implications for social policy

Abstract: Unemployment is associated with a range of health and social problems, such as poor physical health and wellbeing. Welfare state research has recently considered how social policies can ameliorate the harmful effects of unemployment. This article argues that such policy suggestions disregard the role of the work ethic in shaping the experience of unemployment. In societies that glorify employment as a signifier of identity and status, it is unsurprising that those without employment suffer. Previous research s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
42
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The evidence of the positive association between work, health and wellbeing has been gathering for decades, and suggests that being involved in paid work offers meaning to life in terms of social contribution, social recognition, self-fulfilment as well as fulfilling basic needs such as housing and food [1,2]. Sage [1] challenges this view by claiming that it is not the absence of work per se that causes the decline in wellbeing when a person is not working, but rather the loss of identity, respect and status associated with work in today's society. From this perspective, positive associations between wellbeing and work is explained by social status, contributions to society and the self-worth that work provides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evidence of the positive association between work, health and wellbeing has been gathering for decades, and suggests that being involved in paid work offers meaning to life in terms of social contribution, social recognition, self-fulfilment as well as fulfilling basic needs such as housing and food [1,2]. Sage [1] challenges this view by claiming that it is not the absence of work per se that causes the decline in wellbeing when a person is not working, but rather the loss of identity, respect and status associated with work in today's society. From this perspective, positive associations between wellbeing and work is explained by social status, contributions to society and the self-worth that work provides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is known that well-being is subject to the influence of several factors, such as marital status, age, financial resources, among others (Ferreira et al, 2015). Thus, according to Sage (2019), unemployment is one of the factors that also influences the diminishment of wellbeing, as well as self-esteem and physical and psychological health. Such deleterious effects of unemployment occur mainly due to the centrality and the role that work plays in people's lives.…”
Section: Palavras-chavementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Political discourses about work and workfare policies suggest that work is a 'happy object,' in the words of Sara Ahmed (2010, p. 28). At any rate in certain contexts, it is recognised as a source of happiness and wellbeing, for both individuals and societies as a whole (Sage, 2019;Tokumitsu, 2015;Weeks, 2017). On the website of the Dutch government one can read that 'a job offers people social contacts, self-confidence and the possibility for personal development'.…”
Section: Work(fare) As the Promise Of Upward Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Welfare reforms in the Netherlands can be situated in terms of wider policy developments in Europe (and beyond) aimed at encouraging and compelling citizens to be 'active' in the labour market as well as in civil society, as this is believed to improve people's lives and society as a whole, while simultaneously reducing welfare expenditure (Clarke, 2005;Cruikshank, 1999;Muehlebach, 2011;Sage, 2019). These policy developments have been described and analysed in much detail (see, for example, Betzelt & Bothfeld, 2011;Brodkin & Marston, 2013;Newman & Tonkens, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%