2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2166748
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unemployment and Smoking: Causation, Selection, or Common Cause? - Evidence from Longitudinal Data

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2012 to 2016), the unemployment rate at baseline among the 81,997 participants from the CONSTANCES cohort (11%, including 6.1% who are actively seeking employment) is close to the mean unemployment rate in France (10.2%) while taking the definition of the international labour office [35]. In addition, sociodemographic and occupational factors associated with job loss in CONSTANCES were similar to those described in the general population [5,6,15,16,2527,36]. Thanks to the large sample, analyses were stratified for several individual and occupational factors to examine whether these associations were specific to subgroups or rather a general phenomenon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…2012 to 2016), the unemployment rate at baseline among the 81,997 participants from the CONSTANCES cohort (11%, including 6.1% who are actively seeking employment) is close to the mean unemployment rate in France (10.2%) while taking the definition of the international labour office [35]. In addition, sociodemographic and occupational factors associated with job loss in CONSTANCES were similar to those described in the general population [5,6,15,16,2527,36]. Thanks to the large sample, analyses were stratified for several individual and occupational factors to examine whether these associations were specific to subgroups or rather a general phenomenon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…First, the common determinant hypothesis (Cicchetti and Toth, 2009; Schunck and Rogge, 2012; Sroufe, 2007) suggests childhood neighborhood context might be a common source that shapes both adult employment status and substance use. Second, the additive effect (Braveman and Barclay, 2009; Hertzman and Power, 2003) suggests that earlier neighborhood characteristics would exert an independent impact on substance use outcomes beyond unemployment, a proximal risk factor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smoking is likely to affect employment status because of the well-known adverse health effects, however, the negative effect of smoking on the probability of employment is found to be small (Schunck and Rogge, 2012;Neumann, 2013) except for heavy smoking (Jusot et al, 2008). But, smokers are a source of higher costs in particular due to lost productive time associated with illness and smoking breaks, higher insurance premiums, increased accidents during work time, increased fires and fire insurance costs, negative effect on non-smokers colleagues, and early retirement (Bunn et al, 2006;Parrott et al, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%