2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.136408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the rate performance of microporous carbons in aqueous electrolytes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the polarity matching with 6 M KOH solution was not as effective as that with EMIM-TFSI; most likely because K + and OH − ions (∼0.33 nm) are much smaller than EMIM + and TFSI − ions (∼0.9 nm), 86,87 leading to ∼100 times higher ionic conductivity of the aqueous electrolyte than the ionic liquid. 88,89 Consequently, the superwettability of the electrode−electrolyte interface plays a major role when electrolyte ions are sterically demanding and cannot easily access surface micropores to facilitate ionic diffusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, the polarity matching with 6 M KOH solution was not as effective as that with EMIM-TFSI; most likely because K + and OH − ions (∼0.33 nm) are much smaller than EMIM + and TFSI − ions (∼0.9 nm), 86,87 leading to ∼100 times higher ionic conductivity of the aqueous electrolyte than the ionic liquid. 88,89 Consequently, the superwettability of the electrode−electrolyte interface plays a major role when electrolyte ions are sterically demanding and cannot easily access surface micropores to facilitate ionic diffusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the presence of nonpolar EMIM-TFSI, in particular, the EDLCs containing superhydrophobic 3D GFs displayed ≥548 times higher capacitance at ≥0.5 A g –1 than those containing superhydrophilic ones, leading to the capacitance of more than 133.7 F g –1 at ≤0.1 A g –1 . Interestingly, the polarity matching with 6 M KOH solution was not as effective as that with EMIM-TFSI; most likely because K + and OH – ions (∼0.33 nm) are much smaller than EMIM + and TFSI – ions (∼0.9 nm), , leading to ∼100 times higher ionic conductivity of the aqueous electrolyte than the ionic liquid. , Consequently, the superwettability of the electrode–electrolyte interface plays a major role when electrolyte ions are sterically demanding and cannot easily access surface micropores to facilitate ionic diffusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20][21][22][23] Despite their limited voltage window, aqueous electrolytes are widely used because of their higher conductivity in addition to their cost-effectiveness and ease of manufacturing. 20,24 Monte Carlo simulations performed to investigate the formation of EDLs of electrolyte mixtures inside slit nanopores have revealed that the competition between charge and ion size has significant effects on electrolyte distribution in charged cavities. 25,26 Using DFT, Henderson et al 27 investigated the capacitance of a charged hard sphere system near a planar charged surface to find that the minimum capacitance observed at a low ionic density and a small electrode charge converts to a maximum in the capacitance curve with increasing ion density.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%