2006
DOI: 10.1063/1.2166362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the inelastic electron-tunneling spectra of alkanedithiols on gold

Abstract: We present results for a simulated inelastic electron-tunneling spectra (IETS) from calculations using the "gDFTB" code. The geometric and electronic structure is obtained from calculations using a local-basis density-functional scheme, and a nonequilibrium Green's function formalism is employed to deal with the transport aspects of the problem. The calculated spectrum of octanedithiol on gold(111) shows good agreement with experimental results and suggests further details in the assignment of such spectra. We… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
125
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
3
125
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17 More recently, most formalisms have been developed under the Born approximation (BA), either in its self-consistent version [20][21][22] (SCBA) or perturbatively, typically exploiting the small e-VM coupling and/or the small applied bias. 20,23,26 Whereas the SCBA requires large computational resources and therefore its use is generally limited within simple one-dimensional (1D) effective models, perturbative approaches permit lighter implementations and the use of ab initio schemes for the evaluation of the Hamiltonian terms. Apart from TH-based approaches, [17][18][19]29 which are specifically suited for the STM setup albeit they neglect any tip features, it is surprising that hardly any of the above-mentioned schemes, when applied to the simulation of IETS spectra, take additional advantage of the small tunneling terms typically involved in STM-IETS experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…17 More recently, most formalisms have been developed under the Born approximation (BA), either in its self-consistent version [20][21][22] (SCBA) or perturbatively, typically exploiting the small e-VM coupling and/or the small applied bias. 20,23,26 Whereas the SCBA requires large computational resources and therefore its use is generally limited within simple one-dimensional (1D) effective models, perturbative approaches permit lighter implementations and the use of ab initio schemes for the evaluation of the Hamiltonian terms. Apart from TH-based approaches, [17][18][19]29 which are specifically suited for the STM setup albeit they neglect any tip features, it is surprising that hardly any of the above-mentioned schemes, when applied to the simulation of IETS spectra, take additional advantage of the small tunneling terms typically involved in STM-IETS experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11][12][13][14][15] From the theoretical side, a wealth of formalisms dealing with the inelastic transport have been developed in parallel to these delicate experiments. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] The earliest models for IETS employed a multiple scattering formalism (multichannels) with simplified semiempirical Hamiltonians 16 or a Tersoff-Hamman-(TH-) type approach. 17 More recently, most formalisms have been developed under the Born approximation (BA), either in its self-consistent version [20][21][22] (SCBA) or perturbatively, typically exploiting the small e-VM coupling and/or the small applied bias.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on a self-consistent tight-binding procedure with parameters obtained from DFT, 30 Pecchia et al considered vibrational effects in octanethiols bonded to gold electrodes using NEGF and the Born approximation ͑BA͒ for the e-ph interaction. 69 Solomon et al further used this method to simulate the experimental IETS spectra of Wang et al 22,70 Sergueev et al studied a 1,4-benzenedithiolate molecule contacted by two aluminum leads. 71 This study addressed the bias dependence of the vibrational modes and e-ph couplings, but not the inelastic current itself.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1), the only added experimental requirement is the ability to cool the junction. From comparison between experiments and computations (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17), IETS is useful for characterizing numerous aspects of molecular junctions such as the actual presence of the molecule, information on the nature of the interfaces (18), the orientation of the molecule (19), and some symmetry aspects of the junction (20, 21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%