Understanding psychiatric institutionalization: a conceptual review

Abstract

BackgroundSince Goffman’s seminal work on psychiatric institutions, deinstitutionalization has become a leading term in the psychiatric debate. It described the process of closure or downsizing of large psychiatric hospitals and the establishment of alternative services in the community. Yet, there is a lack of clarity on what exactly the concept of institutionalization means in present-day psychiatry. This review aims to identify the meaning of psychiatric institutionalization since the early 1960s to present-day.MethodA conceptual review of institutionalization in psychiatry was conducted. Thematic analysis was used to synthesize the findings.ResultsFour main themes were identified in conceptualizing institutionalization: bricks and mortar of care institutions; policy and legal frameworks regulating care; clinical responsibility and paternalism in clinician-patient relationships; and patients’ adaptive behavior to institutionalized care.ConclusionsThe concept of institutionalization in psychiatry reflects four distinct themes. All themes have some relevance for the contemporary debate on how psychiatric care should develop and on the role of institutional care in psychiatry.

Exploring Personal Medicine as Part of Self-Directed Care: Expanding Perspectives on Medical Necessity

“…Participants took an average of 95 days to initiate their first request. A possible explanation is that consumers commonly play a passive role in treatment decisions (12). SDC represents a major shift in how services are delivered and requires that consumers play more active roles.…”

Mental Health Reform at a Systems Level: Widening the Lens on Recovery-Oriented Care

“…Rather than updating and improving inpatient practices and connecting them to enhanced outpatient care, there is a trend toward narrow, coercive, and restrictive approaches reaching out into community contexts in the form of assertive outreach strategies and CTOs. 64 In this manner, the contemporary, so-called, institution is much less bound by hospital walls. In parallel with the concerns that custodial approaches in hospitals are derived from sources other than evidence-based and ethical practices, we see practices, such as CTOs, being taken up at a pace that far outstrips the dubious evidence about their effectiveness, at least as they are currently being employed.…”

Predictors of Recurrent Use of Psychiatric Emergency Services

“…Prevalence rates of recurrent visits depend on how researchers define recurrence (8); however, frequent visits raise the question of which modalities are best adapted to psychiatric emergency care. Although deinstitutionalization is an important trend in psychiatric care (9), an increasing number of patients seek psychiatric care from emergency services (10).…”