2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2009.02.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding particle dynamics in erosion testers—A review of influences of particle movement on erosion test conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, if there is a stream, interactions within the stream, at or near the surface, may well affect the actual impingement velocity (magnitude and direction) for each particle. Deng et al [31], for example, have found, for an average velocity of about 20 m/s, that actual particle velocities at the outlet of the acceleration tube varied from 6 m/s up to 30 m/s. Moreover, Shipway and Hutchings [32] have suggested that the particles in the acceleration tube are subject to many impacts between themselves and with the wall of the nozzle as they are accelerated, and that such impacts will tend to reduce the final velocity.…”
Section: Glass Beadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if there is a stream, interactions within the stream, at or near the surface, may well affect the actual impingement velocity (magnitude and direction) for each particle. Deng et al [31], for example, have found, for an average velocity of about 20 m/s, that actual particle velocities at the outlet of the acceleration tube varied from 6 m/s up to 30 m/s. Moreover, Shipway and Hutchings [32] have suggested that the particles in the acceleration tube are subject to many impacts between themselves and with the wall of the nozzle as they are accelerated, and that such impacts will tend to reduce the final velocity.…”
Section: Glass Beadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mechanically powered type erosion testers, the particles are accelerated and launched with mechanical forces rather than compressed air. The three main types of mechanical erosion testers are: the centrifugal erosion tester [25][26][27][28][29][30][31], the rotary target with free falling abrasive particles [32], and the rotary cogwheel blaster [33].…”
Section: Mechanically Powered Erosion Testing Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soderberg et al [25] slightly modified the design, naming it 'Erofuge' and derived the formula for particle velocity, particle fluxes and erosion rates. Based on the original design of Kleis et al and modified design of Soderberg et al, the centripetal accelerator erosion test facility [27][28][29][30][31] that was used by the Wolfson Centre for Bulk Solids Handling Technology of the University of Greenwich consisted of a balanced disc whose velocity of rotation could be varied continuously or fixed at any given value. The disc was 0.12 m in radius and contained six radial channels made from a high quality alumina ceramic.…”
Section: Design and Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other researchers have also extensively investigated the particle velocity effect on the solid particle erosion behavior of materials [32,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. Figure 2(a) shows erosion rates of samples as a function of particle pressure at 30°, 60° and 90° impingement angles.…”
Section: Solid Particle Erosion Behavior -Eroded Surfaces Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%