2018
DOI: 10.1111/cfs.12447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Video interaction guidance, based on the Marte Meo method, is used in child protection services (CPSs) and offered to parents to improve interactions with their children. However, the factors that promote and limit the use of video guidance in CPS are unclear. The present study explored the perceptions of 8 Norwegian Marte Meo therapists who utilize this method in the CPS. The therapists were asked questions about the method's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, to clarify factors that may be im… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first theme, “Promoting growth in a coercive context,” shows how the therapists experienced a dilemmatic collision of child protection perspectives and the salutogenic focus of Marte Meo, despite following method recommendations for clearly defined roles (Hedenbro & Wirtberg, 2012). Earlier empirical findings from the CPS (Kiamanesh et al., 2018) identified unaddressed issues of trust and coercion, and lack of structure, as weaknesses of the method, yet it was regarded as suitable for the CPS, and its salutogenic stance cited as positive for client motivation and change. Our findings show, however, that this stance made the therapists more insecure about the validity and implications of what they observed in the interaction, and when a continuation of the guidance became unethical.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The first theme, “Promoting growth in a coercive context,” shows how the therapists experienced a dilemmatic collision of child protection perspectives and the salutogenic focus of Marte Meo, despite following method recommendations for clearly defined roles (Hedenbro & Wirtberg, 2012). Earlier empirical findings from the CPS (Kiamanesh et al., 2018) identified unaddressed issues of trust and coercion, and lack of structure, as weaknesses of the method, yet it was regarded as suitable for the CPS, and its salutogenic stance cited as positive for client motivation and change. Our findings show, however, that this stance made the therapists more insecure about the validity and implications of what they observed in the interaction, and when a continuation of the guidance became unethical.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But its nonmanualized variant lacks a structured approach and does not have an explicit attachment focus. Therapist have found a combination with the Circle‐of‐Security model useful (Kiamanesh et al., 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The first line of research comprises four studies that investigate the use of Marte Meo in the care of female dementia patients (Alnes et al., 2011a, 2011b, 2013; Lykkeslet et al., 2016). A second line of research with another four empirical studies focuses on the Marte Meo counselling process itself, using Marte Meo counsellors as a target group and examining supervision experiences and beneficial therapist characteristics (Kiamanesh et al., 2018; Kristensen et al., 2017; Neander & Skott, 2008; Wächter & Laubenstein, 2013). The last and largest of the three lines of research examines the use of Marte Meo in problematic interactions of children or adolescents with their caregivers.…”
Section: Systematic Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%