2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.01.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty of SWAT model at different DEM resolutions in a large mountainous watershed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
49
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
3
49
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a physically based, semi-distributed and continuous time-step hydrologic model that is used for rainfall-runoff modeling as well as for predicting the impacts of land use and land management practices, and of climate change on the hydrology and water quality of watersheds or river basins. SWAT has been successfully applied to many parts of the world and proved to adequately reproduce hydrological processes of watersheds across a range of geographical regions and climates [31][32][33]. The water cycle simulated by ArcSWAT is based on a water balance, given as:…”
Section: Overview Of Arcswat Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a physically based, semi-distributed and continuous time-step hydrologic model that is used for rainfall-runoff modeling as well as for predicting the impacts of land use and land management practices, and of climate change on the hydrology and water quality of watersheds or river basins. SWAT has been successfully applied to many parts of the world and proved to adequately reproduce hydrological processes of watersheds across a range of geographical regions and climates [31][32][33]. The water cycle simulated by ArcSWAT is based on a water balance, given as:…”
Section: Overview Of Arcswat Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have attempted to explore the sensitivity of hydrological models to land use [11,12], climate [9,13,14], or digital elevation models (DEM) [12,15]. Some studies conducted initial tests on the available data prior to calibration, then chose the data that appeared to perform the best based on certain model efficiency criteria [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies conducted initial tests on the available data prior to calibration, then chose the data that appeared to perform the best based on certain model efficiency criteria [16,17]. Others studied the sensitivity of model outputs to precipitation ensembles [18,19], and their effects on water resource components of non-calibrated models [14,15,20]. Although all these schemes are important and necessary, in all of them, the prediction uncertainty was based on only one dataset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is developed for assessing the impact of management and climate on water supplies, sediment, and agricultural chemical yields in watersheds and larger river basins. SWAT has been widely studied and applied to a number of regions in the world with satisfactory results (BONUMÁ et al, 2014PEREIRA et al, 2014;ZHANG et al, 2014;ABBASPOUR et al, 2015;BRESSIANI et al, 2015). SWAT-CUP (ABBASPOUR et al, 2007) is a software developed for calibrating SWAT parameters and for performing an uncertainty analysis of the modeling results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such difficulty increases the uncertainties involved in the modeling process, especially during the calibration and validation stages. Therefore, methods which evaluate the uncertainty and the sensitivity of modeling parameters are necessary (ZHANG et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%