2013
DOI: 10.1111/josi.12023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty–Identity Theory: Extreme Groups, Radical Behavior, and Authoritarian Leadership

Abstract: This article describes uncertainty-identity theory's analysis of how selfuncertainty may lead, through social identity and self-categorization processesAlthough society contains individuals, both human endeavor and the operation of human cognition tend to organize society into discrete social categories and human groups. The nature of such groups and their relationships to one another govern much of who we are, specifically our social identity, and our associated perceptions, attitudes, feelings and behaviors,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
168
1
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 234 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
6
168
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the fact that people respond differently to adversity does not necessarily imply that separate psychological processes are at play. It may be that, despite conservativism providing a generally more entitative group geared towards in-group bias and ideology (Hogg, 2014;Hogg et al, 2013), it is easier for some people to strongly identify with left-leaning groups and ideology because of their particular social network or life experience.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the fact that people respond differently to adversity does not necessarily imply that separate psychological processes are at play. It may be that, despite conservativism providing a generally more entitative group geared towards in-group bias and ideology (Hogg, 2014;Hogg et al, 2013), it is easier for some people to strongly identify with left-leaning groups and ideology because of their particular social network or life experience.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En raekke studier har peget på, hvordan kognitiv usikkerhed effektivt kan reduceres via identifikation med bestemte grupper (Hogg, Meehan & Farquharson 2010;Hogg & Adelman 2013). I saerdeleshed formår identifikation med "high entativity groups" at reducere usikkerhed, dvs.…”
Section: Truet Tilvaerelsesforankringunclassified
“…Bu sayede kişiler grupların değer yargıları, tutumları ve davranışlarını benimseyerek kendini, diğer insanları ve dünyayı daha belirli hale getirmiş olurlar. Bu noktada belirtmek gerekir ki; belirsizlik yalnızca yeni grup aidiyeti gelişimini değil, aynı zamanda daha önceden benimsenmiş grup aidiyetinin pekişmesini de sağlar (Hogg ve Adelman 2013). Öyle ki bazı durumlarda bu süreç uç-gruplarla oluşturulan grup aidiyetini de kapsamaktadır (Hogg, Adelman ve Blagg, 2010).…”
Section: Belirsizliğin Etkileri Nelerdir?unclassified