2023
DOI: 10.1038/s43247-023-00998-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainties and sensitivities in the quantification of future tropical cyclone risk

Simona Meiler,
Alessio Ciullo,
Chahan M. Kropf
et al.

Abstract: Tropical cyclone risks are expected to increase with climate change and socio-economic development and are subject to substantial uncertainties. We thus assess future global tropical cyclone risk drivers and perform a systematic uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. We combine synthetic tropical cyclones downscaled from CMIP6 global climate models for several emission scenarios with economic growth factors derived from the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and a wide range of vulnerability functions. We highlight … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These aspects also influence the sensitivity analysis. In a previous study, we interpreted the importance of the GCM choice for MIT-based TC risk change estimates as an indication of the relatively advanced state of modeling of TC hazard, and a consequence of the greater complexity of the MIT model, compared to the exposure and vulnerability models (28). However, our current findings suggest a different narrative, especially when comparing the MIT model with CHAZ.…”
Section: Implications For Interpretation Of Results Model Development...mentioning
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These aspects also influence the sensitivity analysis. In a previous study, we interpreted the importance of the GCM choice for MIT-based TC risk change estimates as an indication of the relatively advanced state of modeling of TC hazard, and a consequence of the greater complexity of the MIT model, compared to the exposure and vulnerability models (28). However, our current findings suggest a different narrative, especially when comparing the MIT model with CHAZ.…”
Section: Implications For Interpretation Of Results Model Development...mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…This difference is particularly notable when contrasting results from the two statistical-dynamical TC hazard models CHAZ and MIT. In a previous study solely based on MIT TC hazards, we discovered a positive relationship between the climate sensitivity of GCMs used to downscale TCs and the corresponding increase in TC risk (28). This increase is linked to the scaling of TC potential intensity with global warming (48), which in turn is a strong predictor for TC genesis potential indices (49)(50)(51).…”
Section: Hazard Model-specific Findingsmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations