2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrathin nickel oxide nanosheets for enhanced sodium and lithium storage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
75
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower capacity for sodium storage might be mostly attributed to the sluggish reaction kinetics of sodiation/desodiation because of much larger ionic radius of Na + ion, indicating an incomplete conversion reaction during this sodiation/desodiation process. Even though the specific capacity for NCO@CFC electrode as SIB is lower than lithium storage, the sodium storage performance of the present NCO@CFC nanowire arrays in terms of capacity, cycling stability and rate capability are better than those of other reported electrode materials for SIBs, [44][45][46][47] suggesting that NCO@CFC nanowire arrays are a promising candidate as electrode material for SIBs. Table 1 The comparison of electrochemical Na-storage performance of our sample with partially reported electrodes in references.…”
Section: Sodium Storage Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower capacity for sodium storage might be mostly attributed to the sluggish reaction kinetics of sodiation/desodiation because of much larger ionic radius of Na + ion, indicating an incomplete conversion reaction during this sodiation/desodiation process. Even though the specific capacity for NCO@CFC electrode as SIB is lower than lithium storage, the sodium storage performance of the present NCO@CFC nanowire arrays in terms of capacity, cycling stability and rate capability are better than those of other reported electrode materials for SIBs, [44][45][46][47] suggesting that NCO@CFC nanowire arrays are a promising candidate as electrode material for SIBs. Table 1 The comparison of electrochemical Na-storage performance of our sample with partially reported electrodes in references.…”
Section: Sodium Storage Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17] Nonetheless, more transition metal oxides have been identified as potential candidates in NIBs, including cobalt oxides, copper oxides, and nickel oxides, further highlighting the necessity to explore new anode materials. [22][23][24][25][26][27] VO 2 (B) was known for lithium storage back in the 1980s. [28] It has a high electrical conductivity akin to that of the LiCoO 2 cathodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these new alternative anode materials, transition metal oxides such as CoO x , NiO, CuO and FeO x , which store charge through conversion reactions, have received particular attention because of a high capacity (up to 1000 mA h g À1 ), 2-3 times greater than the graphite electrode [10][11][12][13]. One significant advantage of conversion-type anodes is the versatile selection of available materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%