2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-017-4815-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound measurements of Achilles tendon length using skin markings are more reliable than extended-field-of-view imaging

Abstract: III.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ultrasound is the most preferred method for diagnosing TC rupture and which is also commonly utilized in determining the TC morphometry [24,[33][34][35]40,41]. There is usually a high variability in the TC dimension when measurement is obtained from images acquired using ultrasound.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ultrasound is the most preferred method for diagnosing TC rupture and which is also commonly utilized in determining the TC morphometry [24,[33][34][35]40,41]. There is usually a high variability in the TC dimension when measurement is obtained from images acquired using ultrasound.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to Liem et al [32], Ebeling et al [33] and Kumar et al [27], the superior aspect of the calcaneal tuberosity was used as the reference point from which all measurements were taken in order to reduce variability in the measurements. Also for repeatability, the distal width and circumference ( Figure 1b) were measured 2 cm from the reference point [32,33] while the proximal width was determined at the lowest level of the musculotendinous junction of the gastrocnemius [24,34,35]. Due to ease of access, visibility and without cutting the TC that may compromise measuring its actual length, the medial and lateral lengths of the tendon (Figure 1a) were considered to be the actual length of the TC which is a slight modification to the measurements by Kumar et al [27].…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurements are preformed the same way; they have the same distal landmark but the proximal landmark differs. CALM has shown good reliability and is recommended over other measurements of elongation [17,20,21]. The measure is performed as described by Barfod et al but with the feet of the patient (laying in the prone position) hanging free of the table instead of with 10°degrees of plantar flexion in the ankle joints as originally described [16,21].…”
Section: Secondary Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurements are preformed the same way, they have the same distal landmark, but differs upon the proximal landmark. CALM has shown good reliability and is recommended over other measurements of elongation (17,20,21). The measure is performed as described by Barfod et al but with the feet of the patient (laying in prone position) hanging free of the table instead of 10 degrees of plantar flexion in the ankle joints as originally described (16,21).…”
Section: Secondary Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%