2017
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp17x692117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound-guided injections in primary care: evidence, costs, and suggestions for change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, a meta-analysis conducted in 2011 reported the superiority of ultrasound to radiography in the detection of pneumothorax [31]; however, our survey findings show that only 35% of GPs utilize it for this purpose. Further, the application of ultrasound in the diagnosis of fractures or for procedural guidance, particularly in musculoskeletal and soft tissue injections, is relatively low in spite of the diagnostic accuracy and the cost effectiveness of ultrasound imaging in primary care for such indications [32,33]. It is possible that these conditions are not overly common across Swiss primary care and are more prevalent in emergency room settings, which may therefore explain this disparity.…”
Section: Interpretation and Comparison To Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, a meta-analysis conducted in 2011 reported the superiority of ultrasound to radiography in the detection of pneumothorax [31]; however, our survey findings show that only 35% of GPs utilize it for this purpose. Further, the application of ultrasound in the diagnosis of fractures or for procedural guidance, particularly in musculoskeletal and soft tissue injections, is relatively low in spite of the diagnostic accuracy and the cost effectiveness of ultrasound imaging in primary care for such indications [32,33]. It is possible that these conditions are not overly common across Swiss primary care and are more prevalent in emergency room settings, which may therefore explain this disparity.…”
Section: Interpretation and Comparison To Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, recent reduction in costs have made ultrasonography equipment financially feasible for most clinics. These beliefs are supported by Bee and Thing, 44 who propose that even a 1-to 2-day basic skills ultrasonographic course would be sufficient to train general practitioners to perform musculoskeletal ultrasonogram-guided joint and soft tissue injections. They also speculate that decreasing costs of POC ultrasound machines and the abundance of educational opportunities to train in musculoskeletal ultrasonography will precipitate a new paradigm where such a scenario is commonplace.…”
Section: Ultrasonography As a Clinical Tool To Enhance Safety Of Subcutaneous Immunotherapymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Moreover, the application of ultrasound in the diagnosis of fractures or for procedural guidance, particularly in musculoskeletal and soft tissue injections, is relatively low in spite of the diagnostic accuracy and the cost effectiveness of ultrasound imaging in primary care for such indications [31,32]. It is possible that these conditions are not overly common across Swiss primary care and are more prevalent in emergency room settings, which may therefore explain this disparity.…”
Section: Main Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%