2003
DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2003.tb00510.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound Evaluation of Small Bowel Thickness Compared to Weight in Normal Dogs

Abstract: The use of ultrasound to measure small bowel thickness is an important part of any ultrasound examination of the abdomen. Increased thickness of the intestinal wall is a hallmark for the detection of diseases ranging from inflammatory bowel disease to neoplasia. Our subjective impression has been that dogs with no clinical signs of gastrointestinal disease often have sonographic measurements greater than published norms. The purpose of this study was to prospectively reevaluate these norms. The clinical histor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
52
0
8

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
52
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge, this is a new finding in humans. However, it has previously been observed in dogs [20]. The effect is most pronounced in the duodenum, left colon and rectum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…To our knowledge, this is a new finding in humans. However, it has previously been observed in dogs [20]. The effect is most pronounced in the duodenum, left colon and rectum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The GI tract was evaluated for wall thickness, appearance of wall layers, luminal contents and diameter, and motility. Wall thickness was measured from the inner luminal interface to the outer serosal surface, and considered normal if within published reference ranges (stomach: 2–5 mm, duodenum: 3–6 mm depending on body weight, jejunum: 2–5 mm depending on body weight, ileum: 2–4 mm, and colon: 2–3 mm) . Wall layers were considered normal if all layers were clearly visible, had normal relationship with each other, and were of normal echogenicity .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T he ultrasonographic appearance of the normal adult canine gastrointestinal tract has been described and reference ranges for wall thicknesses of different segments have been established 1–3 . These data include body weight‐correlated reference values for duodenal and jejunal wall thicknesses but do not take into account differences in age or maturity 3 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%