2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2009.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound-assisted capillary microreactor for aqueous–organic multiphase reactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The products prepared by the microreactor with the Caterpillar mixer and the Y-mixer show different features as mentioned above, however, these differences also contain the effect of other factors, such as the flow rate and the residence time. It shows that acoustic disturbing caused by ultrasonic 25,26 promoted the mutual mixing of the reactant streams, strengthened the mass transfer, and produced co-precipitate with more uniform Cu-Zn distribution. Two samples prepared in the Ymixer at ultrasonic and non-ultrasonic condition named after CR-Y1 and CR-Y2 respectively.…”
Section: Effect Of Mixing In Micro-reactorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The products prepared by the microreactor with the Caterpillar mixer and the Y-mixer show different features as mentioned above, however, these differences also contain the effect of other factors, such as the flow rate and the residence time. It shows that acoustic disturbing caused by ultrasonic 25,26 promoted the mutual mixing of the reactant streams, strengthened the mass transfer, and produced co-precipitate with more uniform Cu-Zn distribution. Two samples prepared in the Ymixer at ultrasonic and non-ultrasonic condition named after CR-Y1 and CR-Y2 respectively.…”
Section: Effect Of Mixing In Micro-reactorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen in the figure, the fluctuation of the Cu/Zn ratio of the CR-Y1-precipitate under ultrasonic is smaller than that of CR-Y2-precipitate without ultrasonic. It shows that acoustic disturbing caused by ultrasonic 25,26 promoted the mutual mixing of the reactant streams, strengthened the mass transfer, and produced co-precipitate with more uniform Cu-Zn distribution. For comparison, the data of the Caterpillar mixer are also showed in Figure 7 and its fluctuation is the least.…”
Section: Effect Of Mixing In Micro-reactorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the positive methods, ultrasonic mixing technique is considered a non-contact method to create micro and homogeneous structures with very high efficiency [18]. The superior advantages of ultrasonic technology in the blending of multi-phase currents, because the sound stream, local hot spots are created and the formation of the jet is formed at the average compartments of liquid-liquid phase to create cavity-based bubbles [19], [20], resulting in the implosion of the cavitation-based bubbles by shockwaves [21]. Therefore, the two impregnable liquid-liquid phases affected by ultrasound lead to breakage to create an emulsion [22]- [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a microreactor could operate under continuous flow operation and is easy to scale-up. Microreactor has been applied in many reactions and in both homogeneous [10][11][12][13] and heterogeneous [14][15][16] catalytic systems. Recently, He et al [17] investigated biphasic epoxidation reactions in a microreactor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%