2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonography of the temporomandibular joint: a literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
79
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increase in resolution increased the sensitivity of US. Emshoff et al, used a transducer of 7.5 MHz, with which the sensitivity was found to be 41-50% and specificity was 70% [28], while in other studies where the transducer used was of 10MHz or more, sensitivity was the limited accessibility of the deep structures, especially the disc, due to the absorption of sound waves by the lateral portion of the head of the condyle and the zygomatic process of the temporal bone [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increase in resolution increased the sensitivity of US. Emshoff et al, used a transducer of 7.5 MHz, with which the sensitivity was found to be 41-50% and specificity was 70% [28], while in other studies where the transducer used was of 10MHz or more, sensitivity was the limited accessibility of the deep structures, especially the disc, due to the absorption of sound waves by the lateral portion of the head of the condyle and the zygomatic process of the temporal bone [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies discuses the role of ultrasound in assessment of anterior disc displacement [14][15][16][17][18]. Meta-analysis of diagnosis efficacy of ultrasound in assessment of anterior disc displacement reported that diagnostic efficacy of disc displacement with reduction had a sensitivity of 0.76, a specificity of 0.82, a positive likelihood ratio of 3.80, a negative likelihood ratio of 0.36, a diagnostic odds ratio of 10.95, an area under the curve of 0.83, and a Q* of 0.76.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-resolution ultrasound was used for assessment of the anterior disc displacement of TMJ [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. All these studies discuss the anterior displacement of the TMJ without assessment of sideway displacement of the disc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important issue is that US examination is unable to visualize the medial part of the condyle. On the other hand, being a real time investigation, US provides information regarding disc position during mandibular movements, compared to other TMJ imaging techniques [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a noninvasive, dynamic, inexpensive imaging technique which can be useful in diagnosing articular disc displacements. Variable levels of sensitivity were reported in detection of disc displacement, therefore further studies are required [2][3][4][5][20][21][22][23][24]. It is a technique that depends widely on the operator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%