1987
DOI: 10.1159/000472732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonographic Diagnosis of Infected Lymphocele after Kidney Transplantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, primary infections pre senting prior to instrumentation are uncommon. S. aur eus is reported four times in the literature as a pathogenic agent while other publications list no specific pathogen [8,15,45,46]. There are no cases in the literature reporting P. multocida as a lymphocele pathogen.…”
Section: Symptoms and Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, primary infections pre senting prior to instrumentation are uncommon. S. aur eus is reported four times in the literature as a pathogenic agent while other publications list no specific pathogen [8,15,45,46]. There are no cases in the literature reporting P. multocida as a lymphocele pathogen.…”
Section: Symptoms and Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though computed axial tomography, intravenous pyelogram, lymphoscintigraphy and lymphangiography have been used in the past, ultrasound is clearly the radiologic proce dure of choice [21,34,45,46,49], Though very useful, ultasound cannot make a definitive diagnosis because of its variable reliability in differentiating between lymphoccle, urinoma, seroma, abscess and hematoma. The defin itive diagnosis is made by demonstrating equal concentra tions of electrolytes, urea nitrogen and creatinine in both the lymphocele and the serum.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%