2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonic testing of thin walled components made of aluminum based laminates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conventional technique to detect the internal damages inside structures is non-destructive testing (NDT). The typical damage detecting methods of NDT include visual inspection [1,2], ultrasonic testing (UT) [3], eddy current testing (ECT) [4], penetrant testing (PT) [5] etc. Despite the NDT techniques having been widely applied in some industrial cases, most of them are usually performed off-line [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional technique to detect the internal damages inside structures is non-destructive testing (NDT). The typical damage detecting methods of NDT include visual inspection [1,2], ultrasonic testing (UT) [3], eddy current testing (ECT) [4], penetrant testing (PT) [5] etc. Despite the NDT techniques having been widely applied in some industrial cases, most of them are usually performed off-line [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a frequency greater than or equal to 20kHz, ultrasonic sound waves are widely used for cleaning [7], welding [8], and nondestructive testing [9]. Related studies have shown that ultrasonic vibration can produce seam filling, moistening, and bubble removal effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…into four categories: radiographic testing, ultrasonic testing, penetrant testing, and eddy current testing, but each has its own limitations. For example, radiographic inspection [1,2] cannot locate the depth of defects and the radiographic rays used are harmful to human bodies; ultrasonic inspection [3,4] is prone to leakage and the signal-to-noise ratio of defects is low when non-contact methods are used; eddy current inspection [5,6] is hampered by the skin effect, making it difficult to detect defects deep within the body; and the limited intelligence and reliability of penetration testing [7] make quantitative control of inspection quality difficult to achieve. As a result, new testing methods need to be developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%