2007
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.99.057206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrametricity in the Edwards-Anderson Model

Abstract: We test the property of ultrametricity for the spin glass three-dimensional Edwards-Anderson model in zero magnetic field with numerical simulations up to $20^3$ spins. We find an excellent agreement with the prediction of the mean field theory. Since ultrametricity is not compatible with a trivial structure of the overlap distribution our result contradicts the droplet theory.Comment: typos correcte

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

2
75
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(37 reference statements)
2
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). In [1], these data are used as a strong hint for the presence of a spin glass phase with an ultrametric structure while we obtain almost identical results in the 2d model where it is widely accepted that (i) there is no spin glass phase at any finite temperature, and that (ii) the transition is well-described by the droplet picture.…”
supporting
confidence: 54%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…1). In [1], these data are used as a strong hint for the presence of a spin glass phase with an ultrametric structure while we obtain almost identical results in the 2d model where it is widely accepted that (i) there is no spin glass phase at any finite temperature, and that (ii) the transition is well-described by the droplet picture.…”
supporting
confidence: 54%
“…To conclude, we believe that although the data published in [1] may be compatible with the presence of an ultrametric structure, they are, however, not sufficient to dismiss the possibility that other models as, e.g., the droplet model might apply to the 3d EA spin glass. We also want to emphasize the need of comparing with simple models in order to validate the conclusions reached in large-scale numerical experiments, especially in the context of spin glasses where simulations and their interpretation are known to be difficult.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Unfortunately, the existence of an UM phase structure for SR spin glasses is controversial, mainly because only small linear system sizes have been accessible so far. Recent results [11] suggest that SR systems are not UM, whereas other opinions exist [12,13,14,15]. Thus it is of paramount importance to test if SR spin glasses have an UM phase space.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%