2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0023-6438(03)00015-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrafiltration performance of Carbosep membranes for the clarification of apple juice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

6
56
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
56
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, membrane filtration has the disadvantage of fouling, resulting in decline in performance. Indeed, a major limiting factor in UF is the flux decline with time due to the effects of membrane fouling, that reduce process efficiency [7]. The membrane structure and the molecular weight cut-off have an important role in the solute-membrane physicochemical interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, membrane filtration has the disadvantage of fouling, resulting in decline in performance. Indeed, a major limiting factor in UF is the flux decline with time due to the effects of membrane fouling, that reduce process efficiency [7]. The membrane structure and the molecular weight cut-off have an important role in the solute-membrane physicochemical interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional advantages include easy automation (Mondor and Girard, 2000) and scale up (Nawaz et al, 2006), shorter process time (Mondor and Girard, 2000), lower labor and energy costs, less waste disposal (De Bruijn et al, 2003), no additives and mild operation conditions (Nawaz et al, 2006). However, the main disadvantage of membrane filtration is membrane fouling resulting in decline in permeate flux.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is caused by deposition and accumulation of solute or colloidal particles at the membrane surface (concentration polarization/gel layer) or inside the pores (De Bruijn et al, 2002). Membrane performance is strongly affected by trans-membrane pressure, feed velocity and operating temperature while juice quality may be influenced by membrane pore size or molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) (De Bruijn et al, 2003). For processing apple juice, components potentially causing membrane fouling may be pectins, proteins, starch, hemicelluloses and cellulose as well as tannins and other polyphenolics (Mondor and Girard, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Através da análise de proteínas que causam a turbidez, eles verificaram que a membrana de ultrafiltração de 10kDa foi eficiente na remoção dessas proteínas, reduzindo a formação da turbidez no suco durante o seu armazenamento. Por sua vez, BRUIJN et al [5], ao utilizarem membranas de 15kDa, verificaram que a turbidez do suco de maçã ultrafiltrado aumentou durante a estocagem, seguindo um modelo exponencial. Suco de caju clarificado por microfiltração em membranas com tamanho de poro de 3µm, após pré-tratamento com 0,1% da enzima tanase, apresentou estabilidade física e microbiológica durante dois meses, quando mantido sob refrigeração [6].…”
unclassified