2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10846-014-0090-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UAVs Trajectory Planning by Distributed MPC under Radio Communication Path Loss Constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the signal can vary (fade), for example, due to shadowing from obstacles or due to multipath propagation. Fading may be modeled, for example, as Rayleigh fading (more appropriate for heavily built‐up urban environments), Rician fading (if line‐of‐sight communication dominates), or Nakagami‐ m fading . Therefore, drone positioning as a flying base station depends on signal fading along the communication path, path loss, interferences, and noise.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Drones Relevant To Operational Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the signal can vary (fade), for example, due to shadowing from obstacles or due to multipath propagation. Fading may be modeled, for example, as Rayleigh fading (more appropriate for heavily built‐up urban environments), Rician fading (if line‐of‐sight communication dominates), or Nakagami‐ m fading . Therefore, drone positioning as a flying base station depends on signal fading along the communication path, path loss, interferences, and noise.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Drones Relevant To Operational Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We proceed to do so for the dynamics used for UAV path planning in Grøtli and Johansen [2012], Grancharova et al [2014] of the form (19):…”
Section: Mpc Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in [44], a distributed linear MPC approach was implemented to solve the trajectory planning problem for rotary wing UAVs, with an objective to form a communication network of multiple targets. In this case, the UAV model was a linear relation between position and velocity, while the attitude of the UAV was not considered and thus the authors did not consider the nonlinear behavior of the UAV.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few of them utilized a three dimensional space but the authors used a simple linear model or did not consider the attitude problem of the UAV ( [44], [46], [48]). In general, only few works considered the nonlinear model in a three dimensional space but still the authors, in this approaches have not considered cooperation strategies and focused only on one UAV control problem ( [41], [42], [43]and [45]).…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%