2015
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph120707752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

U.S. Recreational Water Quality Criteria: A Vision for the Future

Abstract: This manuscript evaluates the U.S. Recreational Water Quality Criteria (RWQC) of 2012, based upon discussions during a conference held 11–13 March 2013, in Honolulu, Hawaii. The RWQC of 2012 did not meet expectations among the research community because key recommended studies were not completed, new data to assess risks to bathers exposed to non-point sources of fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) were not developed, and the 2012 RWQC did not show marked improvements in strategies for assessing health risks for ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
(113 reference statements)
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fate and transport of FIB can also differ greatly from that of human pathogens, particularly human viruses [27]. As the regulatory framework shifts from fixed numeric criteria for FIB to a risk-based framework that allows for the establishment of alternative criteria based on equivalent public health protection [28], microbial water quality regulations may embrace alternative indicators and even direct measurement of pathogens [26]. Indeed, coliphages (viruses that infect E. coli) are being considered as a viral fecal indicator because bacteria viruses are expected to mimic fate and transport of human viruses better than FIB [29].…”
Section: Conceptual Model For Removal Of Microbial Contaminantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fate and transport of FIB can also differ greatly from that of human pathogens, particularly human viruses [27]. As the regulatory framework shifts from fixed numeric criteria for FIB to a risk-based framework that allows for the establishment of alternative criteria based on equivalent public health protection [28], microbial water quality regulations may embrace alternative indicators and even direct measurement of pathogens [26]. Indeed, coliphages (viruses that infect E. coli) are being considered as a viral fecal indicator because bacteria viruses are expected to mimic fate and transport of human viruses better than FIB [29].…”
Section: Conceptual Model For Removal Of Microbial Contaminantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FIB can originate from non-human or even non-fecal sources and multiply in environmental habitats (perhaps even in biofilters) under a wide range of climatic conditions [26]. In some biofilters, negative removal efficiency has been reported for E. coli, possibly due to re-growth of this indicator [7].…”
Section: Conceptual Model For Removal Of Microbial Contaminantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They suggested, however, that their results may be site‐specific and influenced by the lack of human sources and negative detection of enteric viruses. Fujioka et al (2015) noted that the 2012 Recreational Water Quality Criteria did not improve strategies to assess bathers’ health risks in all types for recreational waters. Additionally, questions remain concerning human health risks associated with nonpoint sources of fecal pollution (Field and Samadpour, 2007; Yates, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, major limitations in the implementation of the current recreational water quality standards are related to the fact that the approved FIB measurement methods do not determine their sources, and only proven sewage sources of FIB have been shown to reliably predict the risk of disease transmission to swimmers (2). Moreover, many studies have provided evidence that in many situations, FIB are poor indicators of human health risk.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%