To the Editor A recent 2-year follow-up study 1 compared the effect of minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST) vs control (placebo) on neurodevelopment disability and death at 2 years' corrected age.We have some questions about this study. First, why did the authors use the third edition of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (BSID-III) and the Parent Report of Children's Abilities-Revised (PARCA-R) instead of the latest neurodevelopmental assessment tools such as the fourth edition of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (BSID-IV) and the Neurodevelopmental Assessment of the Preterm Infant 2 (NAPI)? The BSID-IV and NAPI preterm newborn evaluation tools better capture neurodevelopmental traits and risk factors than the BSID-III. 3 The PARCA-R is convenient, but is subjective and unreliable. 4 Thus, the BSID-IV or the NAPI may better measure preterm newborn neurodevelopment and impairment.Second, this study did not examine family background, nutritional support, or early intervention programs for preterm newborns, which can affect preterm infant neurodevelopment and respiratory health. 5 The differences between the MIST group and the control group may be obscured without assessment of these factors.Third, this study's findings are noteworthy but need validation. The MIST group had lower rates of respiratoryrelated hospitalization, asthma diagnosis, and bronchodilator use than the control group during the first year. These results suggest MIST may reduce persistent lower respiratory infections in premature infants. These outcomes should be examined to assess whether preterm neonates' lung function and quality of life improve over time.This study did not include pulmonary function tests, chest imaging, or biomarkers to assess the respiratory system. These methods may help explain the influence of MIST on preterm lung development.