1996
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.53.3942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-loop electroweak corrections to the ρ parameter beyond the leading approximation

Abstract: We show that in the framework of the pinch technique the universal part of the parameter can be meaningfully de ned, beyond one loop. The universal part so obtained satis es the crucial requirements of gauge-independence, niteness, and process-independence, even when subleading contributions of the top quark are included. The mechanism which enforces the aforementioned properties is explained in detail, and several subtle eld theoretical issues are discussed.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to understand the origin of the problems associated with the subleading contributions, one should first establish the mechanism that enforces the good behavior of the leading contributions-in particular their UV finiteness [150]. If we denote the leading (fermionic) contributions (both at one and two loops) to the W W and ZZ self-energies by Π (ℓ)µν W W (q) and Π (ℓ)µν ZZ (q), respectively (the label ℓ stands for "leading"), and use the important fact that …”
Section: The Universal Part Of the ρ Parameter Beyond One Loopmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to understand the origin of the problems associated with the subleading contributions, one should first establish the mechanism that enforces the good behavior of the leading contributions-in particular their UV finiteness [150]. If we denote the leading (fermionic) contributions (both at one and two loops) to the W W and ZZ self-energies by Π (ℓ)µν W W (q) and Π (ℓ)µν ZZ (q), respectively (the label ℓ stands for "leading"), and use the important fact that …”
Section: The Universal Part Of the ρ Parameter Beyond One Loopmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, as the reader must have realized by now, this unpleasant trade-off between gaugeindependence and process-independence is completely artificial, and can be easily avoided by defining ∆ un beyond one loop in terms of the physical PT self-energies, namely [150] un , and in particular (5.84), (5.91), and (5.92) are valid both for leading and subleading contributions. Evidently, the PT restores the mechanism for the cancellation of the UV divergences, and guarantees at the same time the gauge-and process-independence of the final answer.…”
Section: ) Then It Is Elementary To Establish Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…with C χ = 1 and C H = i, and 12) where (−1) S is 1 (respectively, −1) when S = χ (respectively, S = H), and S = H (respectively, S = χ) when S = χ (respectively, S = H).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For quantizing the theory, a gauge fixing term must be added to the classical Lagrangian L cl SM . To avoid tree-level mixing between gauge and scalar fields, a renormalizable R ξ gauge of the 't Hooft type is most commonly chosen; this is specified by one gauge parameter for each gauge-boson, and defined through the linear gauge fixing functions 12) yielding to the R ξ gauge fixing Lagrangian…”
Section: The Electroweak Lagrangianmentioning
confidence: 99%