2011
DOI: 10.1109/tmm.2011.2152381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-Level Downlink Scheduling for Real-Time Multimedia Services in LTE Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
132
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
132
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Dimitrova et al (2011) have presented a performance comparison of two distinct scheduling schemes for LTE uplink (fair fixed assignment and fair work-conserving) taking into account both packet level characteristics and flow level dynamics due to the random user behavior. Piro et al (2010) have proposed a novel two-level scheduling algorithm. At the upper level, discrete time linear control theory is the basis for this novel approach.…”
Section: Problem Identification and Proposed Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dimitrova et al (2011) have presented a performance comparison of two distinct scheduling schemes for LTE uplink (fair fixed assignment and fair work-conserving) taking into account both packet level characteristics and flow level dynamics due to the random user behavior. Piro et al (2010) have proposed a novel two-level scheduling algorithm. At the upper level, discrete time linear control theory is the basis for this novel approach.…”
Section: Problem Identification and Proposed Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reader may refer to the works in [2][3][4][5]. However, to the best of the authors' knowledge, none of these strategies has dealt with linear services which require a maximization of the number of users served.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So that, the Channelaware/QoS-aware strategies are very essential for them. Several well-known scheduling algorithms for this group as the Modified Largest Weighted Delay First (M-LWDF) [6], the Exponential/PF (EXP/PF) [16], the LOG and EXP rules [17] or the Frame Level Scheduler (FLS) [14]. In these schedulers, there is only the FLS which guarantees bounded delay for real-time flows, the remaining schedulers transmits users data in a given Transmission Time Interval (TTI) by assigning a computed priority metric that is specific to the scheduler functionality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%