2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00199-017-1036-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two information aggregation mechanisms for predicting the opening weekend box office revenues of films: Boxoffice Prophecy and Guess of Guesses

Abstract: Successful field tests were conducted on two new Information Aggregation Mechanisms (IAMs). The mechanisms collected information held as intuitions about opening weekend box office revenues for movies in Australia. Participants were film school students. One mechanism is similar to parimutuel betting that produces a probability distribution over box office amounts. Except for "art house films", the predicted distribution is indistinguishable from the actual revenues. The second mechanism is based on guesses of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hwang et al (2017) use the Korean motion picture market to create a forecasting model using the big data analysis. Court, Gillen, McKenzie, and Plott (2018) employ two information aggregation mechanisms to forecast the opening weekend box office revenues of movies. Complexity in the box office prediction for the Chinese movie market is examined in Xiao, Li, Chen, Zhao, and Xu (2017).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hwang et al (2017) use the Korean motion picture market to create a forecasting model using the big data analysis. Court, Gillen, McKenzie, and Plott (2018) employ two information aggregation mechanisms to forecast the opening weekend box office revenues of movies. Complexity in the box office prediction for the Chinese movie market is examined in Xiao, Li, Chen, Zhao, and Xu (2017).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistently with that, in political voting arena meta-predictions have been shown to produce better accuracy of election forecasts, as shown in [19] and [20]. In another setting, in [21] authors use “guess of guesses” where respondents guess the box office and are rewarded for how close their guess comes to the median of all guesses. Other research uses predictions of predictions to improve on traditional wisdom of the crowds [22, 23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…This mechanism employed by the NSF is not strategyproof; reviewers are incentivized to guess what others are thinking, not to provide their honest feedback. Hence the mechanism induces a type of Keynesian "Beauty Contest" [30] where the incentives are misaligned and humans have been shown to not behave truthfully [17]. Removing the bonus may be worse, as reviewers would then be able to increase the chance of their own proposal being accepted by rating other proposals lower [46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%