2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.92.085428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-dimensional quantum transport in highly conductive carbon nanotube fibers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MR is defined as [R(H) − R(0)]/R(0), where H is the magnetic field and R(0) is the zero magnetic field resistance. The CNT fiber samples MF1, MF2 and MF3 show a negative MR that exhibits two-dimensional weak localization at low temperatures < 100 K, which is consistent with a previous report on spun CNT fibers 26 . These data are shown in Figure S3 and Figure S4 in the Supporting Information.…”
Section: Mr At Low Temperaturessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The MR is defined as [R(H) − R(0)]/R(0), where H is the magnetic field and R(0) is the zero magnetic field resistance. The CNT fiber samples MF1, MF2 and MF3 show a negative MR that exhibits two-dimensional weak localization at low temperatures < 100 K, which is consistent with a previous report on spun CNT fibers 26 . These data are shown in Figure S3 and Figure S4 in the Supporting Information.…”
Section: Mr At Low Temperaturessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…While successful in describing magnetic field dependence, these listed studies did not quantitatively address, at least in detail, the significant [ 158,166,167 ] influence of resistive junctions between CNT structures on the bulk transport. It is unlikely that the small resistance contribution from weak localization and EEI, nor the too large contribution from hopping, [ 396 ] can explain the full resistance‐temperature dependence of ordered CNT materials, such as those shown in Figure 11b or other CNT transport studies with aligned microstructure [ 329,397,398 ] (particularly when doping influence has been removed [ 15 ] ).…”
Section: Discussion and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weak localization was first applied to the anomalous resistance increase when cooling thin film metals [385,386] and was next used to explain the resistance dependence on magnetic field is disordered graphite. [379,387,388] Later, weak localization explained the cryogenic magnetic field dependence of resistance for a variety of conductive polymers, [389,390] individual MWCNTs, [391] individual CNT bundles, [392,393] unaligned CNT materials, [172,309,394] aligned MWCNT [378] and FWCNT [309,395,396] materials. Some of these studies [378,389,390,395] also incorporated another transport mechanism, where electron-electron interaction (EEI) reduces the thermal electron diffusion through states near the Fermi energy, although was only applicable for temperatures less than 4 K. Generally, these studies demonstrated that weak localization and EEI were a small addition to the resistance, well within 5% of the unmodified resistance.…”
Section: Partitioning Of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Characteristics In A...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17][18][19][20] As electrical and mechanical properties are expected to improve with CNT quality, solution spinning remains invaluable as the only large scale and continuous method to fabricate neat fibers from any CNT manufacturing source, and has been getting traction despite the inherent inconvenience of dealing with strong acids in a laboratory setting. [15][16][17][18]21] However, solution spinning requires at least one gram of CNT material and multiple spinning experiments must be run to optimize process variables (flow rate, concentration, draw ratio, etc. ), making the experimental process relatively time consuming and expensive when attempting to establish general relationships between CNT characteristics and fiber properties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%