2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.129.133002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-Center Interference in the Photoionization Delays of Kr2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We make a comparison with the previous RABBITT simulations on H 2 [39] and confirm validity of our interpretation and accuracy of our numerical results. We also demonstrate a strong dependence of the time delay on the molecular axis orientation discovered earlier in the H + 2 ion [40,41] and the Kr 2 dimer [15].…”
supporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We make a comparison with the previous RABBITT simulations on H 2 [39] and confirm validity of our interpretation and accuracy of our numerical results. We also demonstrate a strong dependence of the time delay on the molecular axis orientation discovered earlier in the H + 2 ion [40,41] and the Kr 2 dimer [15].…”
supporting
confidence: 73%
“…CH 3 I molecule was conducted by Biswas et al [14]. Heck et al [15] presented the experimental observation of two-center interference in the ionization time delays of Kr 2 . Wang et al [16] explored the role of nuclear-electronic coupling in attosecond photoionization of H 2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For photoemission from diatomic molecules, the constructive and destructive interference between the wave packets emitted or scattered from the two atoms leads to a modulation of the photoionization time delay depending on the photoelectron energy. [101][102][103] In this scenario, the nuclear motion during bond softening also leads to a substantial effect on the photoionization time delay, [104] which has been measured recently. [105] Generally speaking, attosecond electron dynamics is an important topic in ultrafast science and its study has led to a variety of novel findings.…”
Section: Recent Advancesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Moreover, the CC delays are generally similar in magnitude to the photoionization delays for the commonly used 800-nm dressing fields, such that they cannot be neglected for any quantitative purpose ( 25 , 27 ). The compromise adopted in most studies to date consists of measuring the difference in the photoionization delays between different species of atomic energy shells ( 2 , 3 ), molecular ionic states ( 15 , 28 ), or species with very similar ionization energies ( 18 , 19 ), to minimize the contributions of the CC delays. With the pioneering addition of angular resolution, the difference in the CC delays between different partial waves has also been determined ( 29 ) and the photoionization delays have been separated into their different angular momentum components, under the assumption that the CC delays were universal and equal to the asymptotic approximation ( 30 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although photoionization dynamics have been measured in atoms (2,3,(8)(9)(10)(11)(12), molecules (13)(14)(15)(16)(17), clusters (18,19), solids (20)(21)(22), and liquids (23), no experiment could so far directly access the delays that are truly associated with one-photon ionization (24,25). Instead, all previously applied techniques leave an indelible, measurementinduced mark on the experimentally determined delays, which is referred to as Coulomb-laser-coupling or continuum-continuum (CC) delay (4,6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%