2016
DOI: 10.19126/suje.05095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turkish Adaptation, Validity and Reliability Studies of Teaching Mathematics in Inclusive Settings Survey

Abstract: The aim of the research is to adapt the Teaching Mathematics in Inclusive Settings (TMIS) survey into Turkish and determine their psychometric properties over the country sample. The research was performed with 338 general education teachers who are responsible teaching mathematics to inclusive students. The scale in which linguistic equivalence and face validity were achieved was a measuring tool of 9-point grading type including 12 items and two sub fields. CFA results (x 2 /df=4.4, RMSEA=.07, SRMR=.04, GFI=… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The GFI value was 0•852, which showed a good fit. The CFA results were consistent with the criteria specified in the literature (23,24) . The statistical results obtained from this scale showed the acceptability and applicability of the C-PFS-T.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The GFI value was 0•852, which showed a good fit. The CFA results were consistent with the criteria specified in the literature (23,24) . The statistical results obtained from this scale showed the acceptability and applicability of the C-PFS-T.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The subgroup internal consistency coefficients ranged between 0•61 and 0•89 (13) . The Cronbach's α values of the subdimensions cannot be Table 3 The fit statistics of the C-PFS-T according to confirmatory factor analysis (23,24) Fit indices Cut-off criteria C-PFS-T results…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DFA results of the scale which was adapted into Turkish (χ2/df=4.4, RMSEA=.10, SRMR=.04, GFI=.90, AGFI=.85, NFI=.98, NNFI=.97, RFI=.97, IFI =.98, CFI=.98) shows that the two-factor structure of the scale has acceptable values of goodness of fit index. The Cronbach Alpha internal consistency coefficient is .95 for the whole scale and the Cronbach Alpha internal consistency coefficients are .92 and .90 for the sub-dimensions (Meral & Takunyacı, 2016).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The TMIS Scale was rearranged by Aerni (2008) and adapted into Turkish by Meral and Takunyacı (2016). The scale consists of 12 items with 9-Likert type (1=not at all; 9=quite a lot).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%