1990
DOI: 10.1038/347369a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tunnelling evidence for predominantly electron–phonon coupling in superconducting Ba1−xKxBiO3 and Nd2−xCexCuO4−y

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

19
93
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 285 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
19
93
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis of this material is of particular interest with respect to the question whether or not there is a change in sign of the order parameter for NCCO. Up to now, there is convincing experimental evidence that NCCO has a dominating s-wave symmetry of the order parameter [18,19,20,21], i.e., the order parameter of NCCO is expected to show no change in sign for different k-directions. Hence, Andreev bound states are expected only for hole doped HTS, which are believed to have a dominating dwave symmetry of the order parameter, but should be absent for NCCO.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of this material is of particular interest with respect to the question whether or not there is a change in sign of the order parameter for NCCO. Up to now, there is convincing experimental evidence that NCCO has a dominating s-wave symmetry of the order parameter [18,19,20,21], i.e., the order parameter of NCCO is expected to show no change in sign for different k-directions. Hence, Andreev bound states are expected only for hole doped HTS, which are believed to have a dominating dwave symmetry of the order parameter, but should be absent for NCCO.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as can already be seen from the differences of the generic phase diagram on the electron-and hole-doped side, the physics of electron-and hole-doped HTS is different. In particular, the order parameter (OP) symmetry of the electron-doped cuprates is most likely of s-wave type [2][3][4][5], in contrast to the d-wave OP symmetry in the hole-doped HTS. To clarify the specific differences and similarities between the electron-and hole-doped HTS a more detailed experimental study of the electron-doped HTS is required.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To clarify this issue we have studied [001] tilt NCCO-GBJs. Since for the electron doped material NCCO there is convincing experimental evidence for a s-wave symmetry of the OP [10][11][12][13], NCCO-GBJs represent an interesting model system to test the influence of the OP symmetry on the transport properties of GBJs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%