2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tunnel face stability in heavily fractured rock masses that follow the Hoek–Brown failure criterion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[32] when geological strength parameters are I GS =10 and I GS =15, which shows the validity of proposed approach in this work. The effect of I GS on failure shape is shown in Fig.…”
Section:  supporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[32] when geological strength parameters are I GS =10 and I GS =15, which shows the validity of proposed approach in this work. The effect of I GS on failure shape is shown in Fig.…”
Section:  supporting
confidence: 60%
“…Based on limit analysis method, SENENT et al [32] obtained the upper bound solution of collapse pressure with nonlinear Hoek-Brown failure criterion when they investigated the face stability of shallow rock tunnels. To verify the correctness of the method in this work, the introduced collapse pressure ratio of tunnel faces in deep stratum gained from this work, T /( ), d…”
Section: Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it is significant to determine the safe thickness of rock wall reasonably in construction process of karst tunnel [1][2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pressurized tunnel face stability is always of concern in tunnel design and construction. Several methods for deterministic analyses were proposed by previous researchers (for instance, Leca and Dormieux 1990;Mollon et al 2010;Senent et al 2013). In recent years, however, there has been an increasing interest in the reliability analysis of tunnel face stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%