2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2015.06.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuning the antiferromagnetic to ferromagnetic phase transition in FeRh thin films by means of low-energy/low fluence ion irradiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, anti-site Fe (Fe on an initial Rh site with B hf (F e II = 38 T) is not created, as one can observe for a Fe-rich B2-FeRh sample, or also the formation of the A2 phase 14 (B hf (A2) = 35 T) does not occur. As discussed for the MÃűssbauer results, one can see that the samples have different amounts of A1-FeRh (blue central singlet), showing an inhomogeneous distribution of this impurity phase,47 while for the present low irradiation fluences a formation of additional A1-FeRh does not occur [22][23][24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Hence, anti-site Fe (Fe on an initial Rh site with B hf (F e II = 38 T) is not created, as one can observe for a Fe-rich B2-FeRh sample, or also the formation of the A2 phase 14 (B hf (A2) = 35 T) does not occur. As discussed for the MÃűssbauer results, one can see that the samples have different amounts of A1-FeRh (blue central singlet), showing an inhomogeneous distribution of this impurity phase,47 while for the present low irradiation fluences a formation of additional A1-FeRh does not occur [22][23][24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 50%
“…A similar persistence of FM below the transition temperature for undosed films has been recently interpreted as interfacial magnetization at the bottom and top of the film, attributed to epitaxial and surface strain [7,8,19]. However, in He-implanted samples, the apparent controllability of this FM ordering lends to question the nature of this phenomenon in irradiated samples [15,16,20]. Traditional magnetometry can only measure the total magnetization of the specimen, providing no insight into the spatial, interfacial, or strain-driven origins of these thermomagnetic effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…From thermomagnetic M vs. T measurements this is evident as an increase in the magnitude of the magnetization below the transition temperature and nominally in the AF phase (see black arrow in Figure 1(b)). Previous measurements of irradiated FeRh films with traditional magnetometer techniques have witnessed a similar FM background ordering [15][16][17][18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, in Ref. , ion beam induced chemical disorder in FeRh was found to be connected with (i) broadening of the temperature range of the phase transition; (ii) shift of the phase transition temperature towards smaller values; (iii) a ferromagnetic background at low temperatures depending on the ion fluence. A canted phase transition can be assigned to structural inhomogeneity, for example chemical disorder, directly determining the canting angle .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%