2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuning support vector machines regression models improves prediction accuracy of soil properties in MIR spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different studies can return different results since the nature of the target function has a strong influence on the performance of the different prediction approaches (Friedman, 2001;Viscarra Rossel and Behrens, 2010). Previous studies reported variable results depending on the soil property and sample set (Deiss et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different studies can return different results since the nature of the target function has a strong influence on the performance of the different prediction approaches (Friedman, 2001;Viscarra Rossel and Behrens, 2010). Previous studies reported variable results depending on the soil property and sample set (Deiss et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome these restrictions, the application of machine learning algorithms, such as random forest (RF) [41][42][43][44][45], artificial neural network (ANN) [23,26,29,40,46,47], and support vector regression (SVR) [11,48,49] algorithms, has gradually developed in soil science research due to the significant advantages of these algorithms over previous approaches, i.e., improved model accuracy, greater computing efficiency, and simplified fitting. Due to the spatial variability in climatic conditions, soil parent materials, human activities, and land use management, no single algorithm model is universally applicable for predicting SOM in different regions [50,51].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results suggest a good suitability of the SVM approach for the above-described C and N parameters. Findings of other authors [29,42] who used and compared SVM with linear methods for MIRS modelling generally support these results, although they were not obtained for organic materials but for soil samples with far smaller C and N contents.…”
Section: Calibration Of Pmirs Svm Prediction Models For Particle Sizementioning
confidence: 72%
“…Moreover, the spectral response of OA can vary widely and limit the performance of linear models such as plsr because factors such as material origin, particle size distribution, fermentation conditions, or pyrolytic decomposition during biochar production and therefore the chemical composition during biochar production vary to a high degree. A computational approach to overcome these interfering influences is the use of machine learning methods [29]. Because of their ability to determine complex and non-linear relationships, these methods became popular in several research fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%