2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2020.109489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuning magnetic properties of single-layer MnTe2 via strain engineering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For comparison, we also investigate the magnetic behavior of free-standing MnTe 2 . The corresponding magnetic moment is calculated to be 3.23 μ B per unit cell, which is in good agreement with the previous work . To get further insight into the magnetic properties of MnTe 2 /ZrS 2 , we adopt the following atomically resolved Hamiltonian. Here, S i is the unit vector (| S i | = 1) indicating the local spin of the i th Mn atom.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For comparison, we also investigate the magnetic behavior of free-standing MnTe 2 . The corresponding magnetic moment is calculated to be 3.23 μ B per unit cell, which is in good agreement with the previous work . To get further insight into the magnetic properties of MnTe 2 /ZrS 2 , we adopt the following atomically resolved Hamiltonian. Here, S i is the unit vector (| S i | = 1) indicating the local spin of the i th Mn atom.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…For comparison, we also investigate the magnetic behavior of free-standing MnTe 2 . The corresponding magnetic moment is calculated to be 3.23 μ B per unit cell, which is in good agreement with the previous work . To get further insight into the magnetic properties of MnTe 2 /ZrS 2 , we adopt the following atomically resolved Hamiltonian. H = J false⟨ i , j false⟩ false( boldS i · boldS j false) λ false⟨ i , j false⟩ false( S i z · S j z false) K CA i ( S i z ) 2 1 2 μ 0 g 0 2 μ normalB 2 4 false⟨ i , j false⟩ 1 boldr i j 3 true[ boldS i · boldS j 3 r i j 3…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[ 40 ] Changing the magnetization easy axis requires overcoming an energy barrier, which can usually be achieved by doping transition metal atoms, [ 57 ] functional radicals, [ 58 ] and applying strain. [ 59 ] As shown in Figure 4 a, we simulated the effect of magnetic fields of different orientations on the valley polarization of SL GdBr 2 . The valley polarization of SL GdBr 2 is sensitive to the spin orientation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biaxial strain is able to tune physical properties of 2D materials effectively, which is defined as e = [(aa 0 )/a 0 ] 9 100%, where a and a 0 are the lattice constants in the condition of strain and equilibrium. For 2D ferromagnet represented by CrX 3 (X = Cl, Br, and I) and MnX 2 (X = S, Se, and Te) [39][40][41][42], strain greatly enriches their electronic and magnetic properties, including the change of bandgap, the phase transition from FM state to AFM state, the significantly increased magnetic anisotropy energy (MAE) and T C , the flip of magnetization direction, etc. In order to meet different requirements, strain engineering is widely used to regulate thermal conductivity [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50].…”
Section: Graphical Abstract Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%